2018
DOI: 10.1080/00102202.2018.1480016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation on the performance and application of a new design of foam generator used for fire extinguishment in underground coal mines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In view of the coal spontaneous combustion, the presently applied fire prevention and control technologies include grouting into the goaf, inert gas injection, spraying composite inhibitor, composite gel injection, , liquid nitrogen injection, and injection of colloidal material. However, there were some disadvantages for these traditional technologies because of their short effective duration, weak stacking ability, poor fluidity, and high cost. Therefore, foam technology was proposed to inhibit spontaneous combustion of coal in goaf areas as a result of its superior advantages, e.g., low density, excellent transportation performance in the pipeline, and excellent ability to spread and stack. In the field of extinguishing fires, aqueous foam has been widely used to extinguish methanol pool fires, forest fires, and coal fires. However, traditional aqueous foam was always unsatisfactory as a result of its quick drainage and weak stability. Especially for the foam used to inhibit spontaneous combustion of coal, it did not have long-term effectiveness to retard the oxidation of coal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of the coal spontaneous combustion, the presently applied fire prevention and control technologies include grouting into the goaf, inert gas injection, spraying composite inhibitor, composite gel injection, , liquid nitrogen injection, and injection of colloidal material. However, there were some disadvantages for these traditional technologies because of their short effective duration, weak stacking ability, poor fluidity, and high cost. Therefore, foam technology was proposed to inhibit spontaneous combustion of coal in goaf areas as a result of its superior advantages, e.g., low density, excellent transportation performance in the pipeline, and excellent ability to spread and stack. In the field of extinguishing fires, aqueous foam has been widely used to extinguish methanol pool fires, forest fires, and coal fires. However, traditional aqueous foam was always unsatisfactory as a result of its quick drainage and weak stability. Especially for the foam used to inhibit spontaneous combustion of coal, it did not have long-term effectiveness to retard the oxidation of coal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem is that the added concentration of foaming agents is relatively high. For example, the concentration of foaming agents for firefighting is 0.8%-3% [22,28,29], and the foaming agents for dust suppression are used at a concentration of 0.5%-3% [30,31]. The high economic cost severely restricts the widespread application of foam extinguishing technology and foam dust suppression technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%