2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2015.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation the effects of different heat inputs supplied to the generator on the energy performance in diffusion absorption refrigeration systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is found to give a better prediction of the real operation of the refrigerator. Ersoz et al [16] investigated experimentally the effect of three different generator heat inputs (62, 80 and 115W) on the energy performance of the DAR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is found to give a better prediction of the real operation of the refrigerator. Ersoz et al [16] investigated experimentally the effect of three different generator heat inputs (62, 80 and 115W) on the energy performance of the DAR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include, first of all, recommendations on heat-moisture modes in regions with the predominant use of systems for obtaining water from atmospheric air [24]: an ambient temperature of 32-34 °C and a dew point temperature of up to 15 °C. For such operating conditions of the scheme given in [20], taking into account our experience [25,26], as well as the results from experimental work by other researchers [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38], we can accept the initial data parameters: a) a lower (higher) evaporation temperature ν min (ν max ) of minus 5 °C (5 °C); b) full pressure in ARU, which ensures the condensation of ammonia vapor when heat is diverted to the environment under a natural convection mode is Р=2.0 MPa; c) the difference in the pressures of the saturated ammonia liquid and the partial pressure of ammonia vapor in SGM at the inlet of the vaporizerthe outlet of the absorber is ∆P H =0.10 MPa, and at the outlet of the vaporizerthe inlet to the solution vaporizer is ∆P B =0.05 MPa; ∆P B =0.35 MPa; d) the difference of the partial pressure of ammonia vapor in SGM and the pressure of the saturation of a weak (strong) AWS in the absorber is 0.10 (0.05) MPa; e) the temperature of the environment (atmospheric air) is t a =32 °C); f) the temperature difference between the environment and the absorber's wall at the inlet and outlet of the AWS is, respectively, ∆t 1 =10 °C and ∆t 2 =14 °C.…”
Section: Materials and Methods To Study The Thermodynamic Parameters Of An Autonomous Absorption Refrigeration Unit Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This limitation is associated with the problems of completely removing of the vapor-gas mixture from the reflux condenser and condenser into the absorber and evaporator during the starting period. With a larger pipe diameter, the front of the gas-vapor mixture is degraded, some of the inert gas remains in the reflux and condensation zones and significantly reduces the intensity of these processes [5,11].…”
Section: Energy Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their advantages are also the minimal cost in comparison with existing types of household refrigeration equipment [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%