2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.comptc.2020.112952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigations of the EPR parameters for three copper complexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The EPR results show that the ∆g // (g // - g e ) (e.g., ~0.348 for GMP/Cu 2+ , ~0.379 for Fmoc-K/GTP/Cu 2+ and 0.389 for Fmoc-K/GDP/Cu 2+ ) of the Cu 2+ complexes containing GDP or GTP, or single nucleotide components, were higher than other complexes containing T2Cu-mimietic sites. The higher ∆g values indicate a lower crystal-field strength 42 as a result of the phosphate groups replacing the π-acid type ligands, such as histidines in copper enzymes and nucleobases in our complexes, as the ligand coordinating to Cu 2+ 16 , and may also indicate that phosphate-Cu 2+ binding was not dominant in the Fmoc-modified amino acids/monophosphate nucleotides (e.g., GMP) hybrids. Cu-Cu distances of <4.0 Å were also found in Fmoc-K/UMP/Cu 2+ (Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The EPR results show that the ∆g // (g // - g e ) (e.g., ~0.348 for GMP/Cu 2+ , ~0.379 for Fmoc-K/GTP/Cu 2+ and 0.389 for Fmoc-K/GDP/Cu 2+ ) of the Cu 2+ complexes containing GDP or GTP, or single nucleotide components, were higher than other complexes containing T2Cu-mimietic sites. The higher ∆g values indicate a lower crystal-field strength 42 as a result of the phosphate groups replacing the π-acid type ligands, such as histidines in copper enzymes and nucleobases in our complexes, as the ligand coordinating to Cu 2+ 16 , and may also indicate that phosphate-Cu 2+ binding was not dominant in the Fmoc-modified amino acids/monophosphate nucleotides (e.g., GMP) hybrids. Cu-Cu distances of <4.0 Å were also found in Fmoc-K/UMP/Cu 2+ (Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Based on the values determined using simulation, the g iso parameter was calculated and plotted as function of the ligand binding site (Figure S3A, Table 1). It mirrors the level of covalence in the Cu II complexes, [33] with higher g iso corresponding to weaker covalence. As previously documented and expected, the addition of sulfur atoms in the coordination sphere of Cu II causes a decrease in both parameters due to the greater electron-donating properties of sulfur atoms than nitrogen atoms.…”
Section: Chemistry-a European Journalmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The MATLAB toolbox EasySpin was used to generate all simulated EPR spectra, to obtain the g values (both g ∥ and g ⊥ ) and A values (Figure S3 and Table S2), which are indicative of the coordination environments and the unpaired copper electrons in the d x 2– y 2 orbital that are facing the ligands directly. The g -shift Δ g (≈ g – g e ) ( g e , free electron g factor, ∼2.0023) is a common parameter used to indicate the strength of the crystal field. Two distinct sets of EPR parameters ( g ∥ , 2.300, A ∥ , 168 × 10 –4 cm –1 ; g ∥ , 2.250, A ∥ , 187 × 10 –4 cm –1 ) were observed in the Fmoc-K/Cu 2+ complex. These parameters were associated with two Cu­(II) species that possess different coordination environments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%