2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigations on sandwich core properties through an experimental–numerical approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this region the crushing and fracture of the cores start ( Figure 5). Depending on the core densification at the end of Region 3, an increase in the compressive stress is observed, as was reported in [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] .…”
Section: Modeling Of the Cell Walls Of Honeycomb Compositessupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this region the crushing and fracture of the cores start ( Figure 5). Depending on the core densification at the end of Region 3, an increase in the compressive stress is observed, as was reported in [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] .…”
Section: Modeling Of the Cell Walls Of Honeycomb Compositessupporting
confidence: 56%
“…From the axial compression collapse tests on the aluminum honeycomb sandwich panel specimen, various potential influential parameters, i.e., the core height, core-cell thickness and panel aspect ratio, it was observed that the core height would be a crucial parameter affecting the sandwich panel's ultimate compressive strength. 18 Tsang and Lagace 19 reported the different failure mechanisms in impact-damaged sandwich panels subjected to uniaxial compressive loads. They observed that the damage propagation and final failure modes were dependent on the relative extents of the core and face-sheet damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Virtual test predictions agreed with experimental data, quantitatively and qualitatively, especially for compression across all materials. Giglio and co-workers [101] carried out similar virtual testing analysis as Heimbs but limited only to Nomex honeycomb core with hexagonal cell shape. Flatwise compression simulations were carried out and experimental results compared closely with predictions from these simulations.…”
Section: Figure 16mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic strategy to model the individual damage mechanisms was to define the damage model for different components, respectively. To simulate the low velocity impact response of composite sandwich structure, the continuum damage mechanics based damage criteria were defined for predicting the intra-laminar damage of composite face sheet with delamination using cohesive zone elements while the mechanical behaviour of honeycomb core can be modelled, referring to the experimentally measured data (Aktay et al 2008;Liu et al 2017) or damage model for Nomex (Chen et al 2017;Liu et al 2015;Giglio et al 2012) or Aluminium honeycomb (Lee et al 2010;Kay 2003).…”
Section: Honeycomb Sandwich Structurementioning
confidence: 99%