2006
DOI: 10.1088/0741-3335/48/5a/s13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigations on the ELM cycle by local 3D perturbation experiments

Abstract: An experimental study is performed to investigate the underlying physics of ELM triggering by imposing local perturbations at the plasma edge. Deuterium is injected during type-I ELMy H-mode phases by solid small pellets or as a supersonic gas jet. In both cases the repetition rate is small compared to the intrinsic ELM frequency, aiming for a small perturbation of the intrinsic ELM cycle. Active triggering of ELMs requires a density perturbation in the gradient region about 1 cm inside the separatrix (measure… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, still as in AUG-C prompt ELMs are triggered very soon (typically in less than 0.1 ms) after the onset of pellet ablation. Thus, as shown in a dedicated earlier study [38], the pellet-imposed perturbation finally causing (or growing into) the ELM is located within the pedestal. Normalized energy losses for pellet-triggered ELMs were derived as indicated in the lower box of figure 6; for cases with no pronounced pellet-induced energy drop (can be identified by dW MHD /dt > 0 at the end of pellet ablation) as in case (A) the difference in W MHD between the onset and end of pellet ablation is taken.…”
Section: Figure 5: To Distinguish Between Pellets Triggering An Elm Asupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notably, still as in AUG-C prompt ELMs are triggered very soon (typically in less than 0.1 ms) after the onset of pellet ablation. Thus, as shown in a dedicated earlier study [38], the pellet-imposed perturbation finally causing (or growing into) the ELM is located within the pedestal. Normalized energy losses for pellet-triggered ELMs were derived as indicated in the lower box of figure 6; for cases with no pronounced pellet-induced energy drop (can be identified by dW MHD /dt > 0 at the end of pellet ablation) as in case (A) the difference in W MHD between the onset and end of pellet ablation is taken.…”
Section: Figure 5: To Distinguish Between Pellets Triggering An Elm Asupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The plot displays data obtained from reference phases for spontaneous ELMs, for a few paced ELMs and for triggering probe pellets injected at 10 Hz. The data set shows consistent behaviour for the evolution of achievable ELM size along an ELM cycle; the trigger lag time is about 8 -10 ms. [38].…”
Section: Trigger Lag Times In Different Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again this change in the balance of power efflux demonstrates the capacity of extrinsic seeding fundamentally to influence the character of ILW H-modes. More generally, the persistence of a dominant ELM component in time-average exhaust re-emphasizes the probable need ultimately to combine extrinsic seeding with some form of active mitigation [149][150][151][152][153][154][155][156][157][158][159][160][161][162] of Type I fluctuations.…”
Section: Inter-elm Heat Load and Elm Lossesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the question is if and how triggered ELMs differ from spontaneous ones. Applied in a perturbative way (pellet rate much smaller than ELM frequency), small and shallow pellet injection may also be seen as a tool to investigate pedestal stability, time scales for communication from the seed perturbation around the torus, non-linear mode growth and filament ejection [21,22]. For the present analysis, the hfs pellet injection system is used with velocities between 240 and 1000 m/s.…”
Section: Pellet Induced Versus Spontaneous Elmsmentioning
confidence: 99%