Submarine Mass Movements and Their Consequences 2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-3071-9_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigations on the Peach 4 Debrite, a Late Pleistocene Mass Movement on the Northwest British Continental Margin

Abstract: The Peach 4 debrite is the most recent in a series of large scale Pleistocene MTDs within the Barra fan on the northwest British continental margin. Geophysical data indicate that Peach 4 was formed through a combination of blocky and muddy debris flows and affects an area of~700 km 2 . BGS core sample 56 -10 36, located directly over the Peach 4 debrite, provides a minimum age of 14.68 ka cal BP for the last major failure. An upwards fining turbidite sequence in BGS core sample 56 -10 239 is associated with i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that the two previous cases (the Storegga Slide and the study area) have similar turbidite rates, and other slope failures (volume > 1,000 km 3 ) located in deepwater regions with gentle slope gradients are similar to the northern South China Sea, the turbidite rates calculated in this work can be used as a reference to large slope failures. A large amount of turbidites (e.g., 1,890-5,292 km 3 for Makran Accretionary Complex) would therefore be expected in large-scale slope failures (see Table S2 for the possible turbidite contents of large-scale slope failures [imaged volume ≥ 1,000 km 3 ]; Armandita et al, 2015;Burg et al, 2008;Calvès et al, 2015;Chaytor et al, 2010;Collot et al, 2001;Denne et al, 2013;Dingle, 1977Dingle, , 1980Frey-Martinez et al, 2005;Gee et al, 2006;Haflidason et al, 2004;Hjelstuen et al, 2007;Lamarche et al, 2008;Lee et al, 2004;Leslie & Mann, 2016;Mosher et al, 2012;Niemi et al, 2000;Owen et al, 2010;Piper et al, 1997;Popenoe et al, 1993;Torelli et al, 1997;Trincardi & Argnani, 1990;Vanneste et al, 2006;Wynn et al, 2000). It is worth to note that there are still some uncertainties about the volume estimates for turbidites in the study area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that the two previous cases (the Storegga Slide and the study area) have similar turbidite rates, and other slope failures (volume > 1,000 km 3 ) located in deepwater regions with gentle slope gradients are similar to the northern South China Sea, the turbidite rates calculated in this work can be used as a reference to large slope failures. A large amount of turbidites (e.g., 1,890-5,292 km 3 for Makran Accretionary Complex) would therefore be expected in large-scale slope failures (see Table S2 for the possible turbidite contents of large-scale slope failures [imaged volume ≥ 1,000 km 3 ]; Armandita et al, 2015;Burg et al, 2008;Calvès et al, 2015;Chaytor et al, 2010;Collot et al, 2001;Denne et al, 2013;Dingle, 1977Dingle, , 1980Frey-Martinez et al, 2005;Gee et al, 2006;Haflidason et al, 2004;Hjelstuen et al, 2007;Lamarche et al, 2008;Lee et al, 2004;Leslie & Mann, 2016;Mosher et al, 2012;Niemi et al, 2000;Owen et al, 2010;Piper et al, 1997;Popenoe et al, 1993;Torelli et al, 1997;Trincardi & Argnani, 1990;Vanneste et al, 2006;Wynn et al, 2000). It is worth to note that there are still some uncertainties about the volume estimates for turbidites in the study area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the location of 56/-10/36 within the area bounded by the prominent landslide scarp it would be expected that this core would provide a minimum age for the emplacement of Peach 4 (Owen et al, 2010). However, on analysing the data more closely it seems that the core does not match the nearby seismic data, which indicates a hard seabed as opposed to the soft material sampled by the core.…”
Section: Core Chronologymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This paper builds on extensive previous work on the Peach Slide and includes a reanalysis of seismic and other geophysical data (see Owen et al, 2015) as well as new foraminiferal δ 18 O, particle size sedimentology and 14 C dates from a core in the Peach Slide headwall area (using methods presented by Owen et al, 2010;Owen, 2013). These new data are combined with key previous work in the area (Armishaw et al, 1998;Armishaw et al, 2000;Holmes et al, 1998;Knutz et al, 2002;Kroon et al, 2000) and recent studies on the growth, extent and deglaciation of the British-Irish Ice Sheet (BIIS) (Clark et al, 2012;Dove et al, 2015;Hughes et al, 2016;Small et al, 2017) to provide an updated geological model for sedimentation on the Barra Fan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two historical submarine mass movement events of particular interest: the first occurred in the Barra Fan, offshore north-west of Ireland (Owen et al, 2010), and the second in the Porcupine Basin, offshore south-west of Ireland (Huvenne et al, 2002). Both of these locations are indicated in Fig.…”
Section: Categories Of Ocean Wavesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Holmes et al (1998) suggest that four large-scale submarine landslides make up the Peach Slide. Owen et al (2010) sampled and analysed cores from the area. They concluded that the Peach 4 debrite, the most recent in a series of large-scale mass transport deposits, has a minimum age of 14 680 yr BP, was formed through a combination of blocky and muddy debris flows and affects an area of 700 km 2 .…”
Section: : Fastnet Rock Lighthouse [S15]mentioning
confidence: 99%