1996
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3894(95)00042-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigations to improve and assess the accuracy of computational fluid dynamic based explosion models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…REAGAS, FLACS, EXSIM, and COBRA) have been developed to achieve this end. 6 In these codes, the resolution of the computational grid is rather coarse and, thus, sub-models are required to describe the effect of obstacles, the turbulent flow, and the combustion processes that occur on much smaller length scales. These sub-models, however, do not accurately describe supersonic combustion controlled by auto-ignition and by shock wave interactions.?…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…REAGAS, FLACS, EXSIM, and COBRA) have been developed to achieve this end. 6 In these codes, the resolution of the computational grid is rather coarse and, thus, sub-models are required to describe the effect of obstacles, the turbulent flow, and the combustion processes that occur on much smaller length scales. These sub-models, however, do not accurately describe supersonic combustion controlled by auto-ignition and by shock wave interactions.?…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that turbulence source terms were ignored in previous studies of Ivings et al [5] , Fothergill et al [3] and Gilham et al [2], whereas these terms are included in this study. For high Reynolds number turbulent flows one could write the momentum source term as [10] …”
Section: Porosity Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where L is the turbulence length scale associated with the porous region and in this work it is taken as 10% of the obstacle length in a given coordinate direction, C k is a turbulence constant and is generally assumed to be independent of the obstacle type [10]. One method of obtaining C 2 is to use the Ergun equation [11], which gives the pressure drop across a packed bed.…”
Section: Porosity Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For further discussion regarding the relative performances of COBRA and other currently used explosion models, the reader is directed to the work of Popat et al [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%