2002
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.296461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investment, Uncertainty, and Liquidity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
170
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
14
170
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to Bloom et al (2007) who find that firm-specific time varying uncertainty affects firms' behavior while macroeconomic uncertainty does not, our findings suggest that both firm-specific and market-level (macroeconomic) uncertainty can enhance or impair fixed investment, alone or in conjunction with firms' degree of leverage, clouding the relationship between investment and uncertainty (Boyle and Guthrie (2003)). Notes: p25, p50, p75 are the quartiles of the variables, while sd are their standard deviations.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…In contrast to Bloom et al (2007) who find that firm-specific time varying uncertainty affects firms' behavior while macroeconomic uncertainty does not, our findings suggest that both firm-specific and market-level (macroeconomic) uncertainty can enhance or impair fixed investment, alone or in conjunction with firms' degree of leverage, clouding the relationship between investment and uncertainty (Boyle and Guthrie (2003)). Notes: p25, p50, p75 are the quartiles of the variables, while sd are their standard deviations.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…Interestingly, we find that while the effects of Own uncertainty through cash flows on firms' fixed investment is positive, that of Market uncertainty is negative. In contrast to those of Bloom et al (2007), our findings suggest that (although the two models differ) different types of uncertainty can enhance or impair fixed investment by themselves or through cash flow, potentially clouding the relationship between investment and uncertainty (Boyle and Guthrie (2003)). We also show that the impact of cash flow on capital investment changes as the underlying uncertainty varies.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…19 The point estimates and 95% confidence interval for each derivative are computed and plotted in Figure 1. Even a casual inspection of these derivatives shows that the role of uncertainty on firm investment is not trivial, and varies considerably across types of uncertainty, in line with arguments put forth by Boyle and Guthrie (2003). 20 In particular, one can see that an increase in the firm-level (η) uncertainty measure leads to an increase in 19 Tables of numerical values underlying the graphs are available from the authors upon request. 20 ".…”
Section: The Impact Of Cash Flow and Uncertaintysupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To determine the values of the quantities of interest, it is necessary to select parameter values for the initial value of the firm's assets A 0 , the cost of investment I, the risk free interest rate r, the dividend yield d, the firm's beta b M , the market volatility s M , idiosyncratic volatility k, the subjective discount rate r, the Sharpe ratio y, the cost parameter g, and the coefficient of risk aversion R. Whenever possible, we use the parameters values of Boyle and Guthrie (2003). Additional parameter values for the base case environment are reported in Table 1.…”
Section: Model Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%