Investor Reactions to New Product Development Failures

Abstract

The authors develop a model of investor reactions to new product development (NPD) failures in high technology firms. They propose that a firm's financial and managerial capabilities, and its strategic focus on R&D, influence investors' perceptions of the firm's market value after NPD failure and that these effects are contingent on the development stage of the failed product. Using data on 148 NPD failures of publicly traded biopharmaceutical firms and an event study methodology the authors find support for their hypotheses. They show that the relationships between a firm's (a) financial capabilities, (b) managerial capabilities, and (c) strategic focus on R&D, respectively, and the decline of firm market value after NPD failure are more negative for products that fail in late development stages than for products that fail in early development stages. The authors' results highlight the importance of a conjoint consideration of productlevel and organizational-level effects in explaining investor reactions to NPD outcomes.

Top management service commitment and new product development in manufacturing firms: the moderating role of dysfunctional competition

“…New product development (NPD) is an effective measure for firms to obtain product differentiation and competitive advantages (Fang, 2008). However, as the market matures, introducing new products becomes more difficult, especially those that are novel to the market (Henard and Szymanski, 2001; Urbig et al , 2013). For example, Apple has added incremental innovations such as the high-resolved camera to new iPhones since they launched their first model in 2007.…”

Strategic leadership and technological innovation: A comprehensive review and research agenda

“…For example, Cummings and Knott (2018) found that outside CEO succession is negatively related to the firm's ability to generate sales through increased R&D investments, indicating a need for technical expertise and knowledge of internal processes to ensure the successful management of R&D investments. A single study investigates the capital market's reaction to failures in new product development and finds that managerial experience reduces negative market reactions to such failures (Urbig, Bürger, Patzelt, & Schweizer, 2013).…”

“…Moreover, TMT education affects innovation outcomes. Science or engineering degrees (Scherer & Huh, 1992) as well as a higher level of education in the TMT (Bantel & Jackson, 1989;Heyden, Reimer, & van Doorn, 2017) With regard to the prior work experience of TMT members, when the TMT is experienced in specific topics or industries, it generally has a stronger focus on innovation activities related to those topics or industries (e.g., Hoffman & Hegarty, 1993;Somaya, Williamson, & Zhang, 2007;Urbig, Bürger, Patzelt, & Schweizer, 2013). For example, Tyler and Steensma (1998) found a positive relationship between the technical work experience of TMT members and their assessments of potential research alliances.…”

Understanding Factors Affecting Innovation Resistance of Mobile Payments in Taiwan: An Integrative Perspective

“…Product innovation is a process of great uncertainty and the launch of new products can have many effects on a company's competitiveness [32,33]. On one hand, revenues from new products and services can help companies to achieve profitability and market position [34], but new products with lower revenues may be abandoned if they are seen to hurt the company's competitiveness, destroy its brand image, or have a negative financial impact on investors [35]. Therefore, identifying the cause of product failure is a core challenge when managing a company's innovation activities.…”