1995
DOI: 10.1080/02331889508802474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invited Discussion Paper Constrained Optimization of Experimental Design

Abstract: This is an attempt to discuss various approaches developed in experimental design when constraints are imposed. These constraints may be on the total cost of the experiment, the location of the supporting point, the value of auxiliary objective functions, and so on. The basic idea of the paper is that all corresponding optimization problems can be imbedded in the convex theory of experimental design. Part 1 is concerned with the properties of optimal designs, while Part 2 is devoted mainly to numerical methods… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such an approach has been followed for instance by Cook and Fedorov (1995), Mentré, Mallet and Baccar (1997), Tack and Vandebroek (2004) and Fedorov and Leonov (2005). However, this can be much more difficult to implement in the case that we consider than when the total number of observations is fixed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such an approach has been followed for instance by Cook and Fedorov (1995), Mentré, Mallet and Baccar (1997), Tack and Vandebroek (2004) and Fedorov and Leonov (2005). However, this can be much more difficult to implement in the case that we consider than when the total number of observations is fixed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if the cost of the observations in the design region differs substantially this can be taken into account so that the budget for the study is not overspent. Elfving (1952) defines the problem, which is later addressed by many researchers including Cook and Fedorov (1995), Tack and Vandebroek (2004) and Fedorov and Leonov (2005). In all these cases a prespecified number of observations are selected using some design criterion of optimality, or a utility function, that incorporates the information about the cost of the observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed in [6,11], there are situations where the design measures need to have (possibly, bounded) densities with respect to a fixed reference measure λ. In our framework this corresponds to an optimisation problem in the space M λ of measures absolutely continuous with respect λ or in the space…”
Section: Example 34 (D-optimal Designs With Bounded Densities)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This usually calls for major changes in proofs, since a new family of matrices has to be analysed at Step I of (1.3). Therefore, for each new type of constraint on µ both steps in (1.3) have to be reworked, for example, as in [6] and [11], where various types of constraint are analysed. Specific issues concerning optimal designs on general (not necessarily symmetric) experimental domains are considered in [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kiefer and Wolfowitz [15] [16] developed the well-known Equivalence Theorem (KWT theorem), which provides a practical way to check if a design is D-optimal. This theorem shows that for continuous designs, Dand G-optimal designs are equivalent under some standard assumptions [15] [16].…”
Section: D-optimalitymentioning
confidence: 99%