1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0261-2194(98)00041-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Involving grain traders in determining the effect of post-harvest insect damage on the price of maize in African markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Percentage weight loss was relatively less affected by the fungi, because the difference in weight between infected and uninfected kernels was slight, but percentage grain damage was strongly affected, which may be more important in terms of maize value. Compton et al (1998a) noted that fungal damage had a strong effect on market price, and that percentage grain damage is an appropriate measure of market value.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Percentage weight loss was relatively less affected by the fungi, because the difference in weight between infected and uninfected kernels was slight, but percentage grain damage was strongly affected, which may be more important in terms of maize value. Compton et al (1998a) noted that fungal damage had a strong effect on market price, and that percentage grain damage is an appropriate measure of market value.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pet store 0.62 insects/trap/week Toews et al 2003 Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky maize trader 5-6% damage Compton et al 1998 Sitophilus spp. and R. dominica that cause more damage than Tribolium spp.…”
Section: Decision Thresholdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P. truncatus was accidentally introduced to Africa from Central America, probably in the late 1970s, and has since spread through at least 15 countries (Hodges et al 1983, Bell et al 1999 where it has caused a dramatic increase in postharvest losses. Weight losses in stores infested with P. truncatus often exceed 20% (Pantenius 1988, and such heavily damaged maize might have little or no market value (Compton et al 1998). Some workers (e.g., Golob and Hanks 1990) have proposed chemical control of these pests in traditional systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue of proÞtability is complicated by factors such as differences in maize prices between markets and changes over time. Furthermore, buyers of maize at the market are more tolerant of grain damage later in the season than just after harvest (Compton et al 1998), so that, under moderate infestation pressure, farmers may not receive a higher price for treated grain or a return on their pesticide investment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%