2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(03)00661-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iodine brachytherapy as an alternative to enucleation for large uveal melanomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
66
1
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
66
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternative treatments include brachytherapy [14,25,26], gamma-knife radiosurgery [27], proton beam radiation [28,29], fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy [30,31], and partial lamellar sclerouvectomy [32]. However, none of these alternative therapies has been evaluated prospectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative treatments include brachytherapy [14,25,26], gamma-knife radiosurgery [27], proton beam radiation [28,29], fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy [30,31], and partial lamellar sclerouvectomy [32]. However, none of these alternative therapies has been evaluated prospectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five-year unadjusted survival rates for the two therapies were comparable, at slightly better than 80% for both. 32 The COMS and other recent trials have shown that iodine-125 brachytherapy provides survival rates equal to enucleation for both medium 27 and large 33,34 choroidal melanomas, providing reliable data when alternative treatment methods are discussed with patients.…”
Section: Radiotherapymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…There have been no clinical trials evaluating the effectiveness of therapies other than enucleation for large melanomas. 33 A major criticism of the COMS is that its primary findings essentially confirm what was strongly suspected but never proven 15 years ago -that for medium-size choroidal melanomas, there is no difference in survival benefit between brachytherapy or enucleation. The argument that the cost and the length of time to complete the COMS used limited national resources needed for the development of more promising therapies or for the advancement of basic research into melanoma biology is no longer relevant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%