2018
DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000010617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iodixanol versus iopromide in patients with renal insufficiency undergoing coronary angiography with or without PCI

Abstract: Analysis of pooled data from 8 randomized controlled trials of iodixanol against iopromide in patients with renal insufficiency undergoing coronary angiography with or without PCI showed that iodixanol nonsignificantly reduced the incidence of CIN, but was associated with a significantly reduced risk of cardiovascular adverse events when compared with iopromide.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…IOCM has osmolality similar to that of plasma, but it has a higher viscosity, which can limit the benefits from lowering the osmolality compared with LOCM. Results comparing the risk of CIN after using LOCM and IOCM have been controversial [ 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ]. A meta-analysis comparing the risk of CIN between iodixanol (IOCM) and iopromide (LOCM) in eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 3532 patients undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) with or without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) found no significant difference in the incidence of CIN, but adverse cardiovascular events were significantly fewer in the iodixanol group than the iopromide group [ 41 ].…”
Section: Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IOCM has osmolality similar to that of plasma, but it has a higher viscosity, which can limit the benefits from lowering the osmolality compared with LOCM. Results comparing the risk of CIN after using LOCM and IOCM have been controversial [ 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ]. A meta-analysis comparing the risk of CIN between iodixanol (IOCM) and iopromide (LOCM) in eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 3532 patients undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) with or without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) found no significant difference in the incidence of CIN, but adverse cardiovascular events were significantly fewer in the iodixanol group than the iopromide group [ 41 ].…”
Section: Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Note: Examples of approved imaging agent target organ toxicities are summarized. Data are summarized based on these references (Murphy & Oudit, 2010; Woolen et al, 2020; J. Zhang et al, 2018) and databases (CardinalHealth, 2019; Drugs, 2020). …”
Section: Barriers and Challenges In Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Compared with other CM, iodixanol (iso-osmotic contrast media) was associated with less nephrotoxicity and reduced risk of cardiovascular adverse events and heat discomfort. 1618 Therefore, the patients with normal and mild abnormal Scr levels (Scr ⩽ 177 µmol/L) before surgery were treated with iopromide (LOCM). The patients with moderately and severely abnormal Scr level (Scr > 177 µmol/L) were treated with Iodixanol.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%