1981
DOI: 10.1116/1.571256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ion beam exposure profiles in PMMA–computer simulation

Abstract: A comprehensive Monte Carlo program (piber) has been developed for the simulation of ion beam exposure of resists. piber has been used to study ion ranges, backscattering coefficients, and energy-loss distribution data for various combinations of incident ions and multilayered targets. For lithographic applications, the spatial ion energy-loss distribution in polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) generated with piber for a δ-function exposure is convoluted with realistic incident ion beam shape (Gaussian, square, etc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences in the observed multiciphered dependencies are small and they could be neglected in numerical simulation of the development process in PMMA resist. In the case of ion exposure process a similar linear or non-linear solution processes were observed pertaining to ion mass (Brault & Miller, 1980;Karapiperis et al, 1981;Vutova & Mladenov, 2001) due to the different radiation ion efficiency to the energy transfer and subsequently, to different latent images. In Fig.3 one can see the non-linear (multi-valued) solubility rate obtained in the case of He + (Fig.3a) and Ar + (Fig.3b) irradiations of PMMA.…”
Section: Lithography 354mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The differences in the observed multiciphered dependencies are small and they could be neglected in numerical simulation of the development process in PMMA resist. In the case of ion exposure process a similar linear or non-linear solution processes were observed pertaining to ion mass (Brault & Miller, 1980;Karapiperis et al, 1981;Vutova & Mladenov, 2001) due to the different radiation ion efficiency to the energy transfer and subsequently, to different latent images. In Fig.3 one can see the non-linear (multi-valued) solubility rate obtained in the case of He + (Fig.3a) and Ar + (Fig.3b) irradiations of PMMA.…”
Section: Lithography 354mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…and for a chosen developer. The given data (Brault & Miller, 1980;Karapiperis et al, 1981) presents the sensitivity D 0 and the contrast γ d in the case of some ion beam resists. Generally, the sensitivity of the polymer resists at the ion exposure is assumed to be higher than at the electron exposure (Brewer 1980;Ryssel et al,1991).…”
Section: Sensitivity and Contrast Of Electron And Ion Resists And Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrogen or Helium ion beams are scattered much less in resist layers than electron beams [8]. Thus, pattern transfer is possible in single layer resists on wafers with substantial topography.…”
Section: Ion Projector Depth Of Focus and Exposures In Single Resist mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La rétrodiffusion des ions sur le substrat est négligeable. La figure 1 montre la simulation par ordinateur des trajets de 50 ions H + d'énergie 60 keV traversant une couche de PMMA déposée sur divers substrats [10]. On remarque qu'à une profondeur de 400 nm, la déviation latérale de la plupart des ions incidents ne dépasse pas 30 nm.…”
unclassified