2016
DOI: 10.1039/c5ra17326d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ion size, loading, and charge determine the mechanical properties, surface apatite, and cell growth of silver and tantalum doped calcium silicate

Abstract: This study describes how various loadings of two ions with different size and charge, such as silver and tantalum, can affect the mechanical and biological properties of calcium silicate (CS).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mechanical strength of dense DCSC disks is primarily determined by their sintering kinetics and densification profile, both of which are affected by the stoichiometric formula of the ceramic, the presence of dopant oxides, and the resulting atomic or ionic interactions. Similar relations have been observed for β-TCP scaffolds [ 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 ] and other ceramics [ 57 , 58 , 59 ] containing various oxide dopants. As shown in Table 2 , all dense DCSCs (except hardystonite) had lower porosity compared to α-CS (15.5%) and β-CS (18.6%), indicating enhanced densification in DCSCs which is a key contributor to their improved mechanical strength.…”
Section: Mechanical Properties Of Solid and Porous Dcscssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mechanical strength of dense DCSC disks is primarily determined by their sintering kinetics and densification profile, both of which are affected by the stoichiometric formula of the ceramic, the presence of dopant oxides, and the resulting atomic or ionic interactions. Similar relations have been observed for β-TCP scaffolds [ 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 ] and other ceramics [ 57 , 58 , 59 ] containing various oxide dopants. As shown in Table 2 , all dense DCSCs (except hardystonite) had lower porosity compared to α-CS (15.5%) and β-CS (18.6%), indicating enhanced densification in DCSCs which is a key contributor to their improved mechanical strength.…”
Section: Mechanical Properties Of Solid and Porous Dcscssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Similar relations have been observed for β-TCP scaffolds [53,54,55,56] and other ceramics [57,58,59] containing various oxide dopants. As shown in Table 2, all dense DCSCs (except hardystonite) had lower porosity compared to α-CS (15.5%) and β-CS (18.6%), indicating enhanced densification in DCSCs which is a key contributor to their improved mechanical strength.…”
Section: Mechanical Properties Of Solid and Porous Dcscssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Still the data showed that different kinds of charged surfaces led to obviously different cell morphology. So, the electric properties of the materials, including the types and densities, have great influence on the cell adhesion behavior (Shirazi et al, 2016; Kuo and Rajesh, 2017).…”
Section: The Influencing Factors Of Biocompatibility Of Aliphatic Polmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, insertion of implants to replace the injured parts often gives discomfort to patients, due to the brittleness and insufficient biological properties of the bioceramic implants [5]. Therefore, many attempts have been made to improve the functional specifications of ceramic implants and to regenerate old and deteriorating bones with a biomaterial that can be substituted by a new mature bone without transient loss of a mechanical support [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%