1993
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.1290070717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ion trap and quadrupole mass spectra of lignin pyrolysates: How well do they compare?

Abstract: Lignin samples from wheat straw, orchard grass, red clover and a synthetic lignin were subjected to pyrolysis gas chromatography/mass spectrometry using both quadrupole (QMS) and ion-trap detector (ITD). ITD mass spectra were comparable with those presented in the National Bureau of Standards (NBS) library and with those obtained by QMS as evaluated by discrepancy factors. Computer-assisted library searches for ITD spectra were successful for 22 of 47 compounds. The other 25 compounds were not present in the l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mass spectra were obtained by electron impact at 70 eV from 40 to 400 m/z (1 scan/s). Peak identification was based on mass spectral interpretation and on published libraries of mass spectra of lignocellulose pyrolyzates (Galletti and Bocchini, 1995;Galletti et al, 1993;Ralph and Hatfield, 1991). Peak areas were expressed as percentages from the total ion current (TIC) chromatogram.…”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mass spectra were obtained by electron impact at 70 eV from 40 to 400 m/z (1 scan/s). Peak identification was based on mass spectral interpretation and on published libraries of mass spectra of lignocellulose pyrolyzates (Galletti and Bocchini, 1995;Galletti et al, 1993;Ralph and Hatfield, 1991). Peak areas were expressed as percentages from the total ion current (TIC) chromatogram.…”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the small number of components of this group, their relative contribution was large, and ranged from 5.7 to 14.7% in FOR soils, from 7.5 to 17.9% in AGR soils and from 2.4 to 5.8% in PAL soils. These components were attributed to proteins (Galletti et al , 1993) and to lignins and cellulose (Stuczynski et al , 1997). The fact that the phenolic and the lignin‐derived components were both present in greater amounts in the actual topsoils (AGR and FOR soils), where the input of fresh material is larger, than in the buried (PAL) soils, where the input was nil, indicates that these two groups can be regarded as part of the primary organic matter of soil and that these components are not greatly resistant to degradation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%