2016
DOI: 10.3906/kim-1512-37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ionic liquid based microextraction combined with derivatization for efficient enrichment/determination of asulam and sulfide

Abstract: This study reports 2 new simple derivatization-based dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) methods for spectrophotometric ultratrace determination of asulam and sulfide. 1-Naphthol (in the presence of nitrite) and N,N-diethyl-p-phenylenediamine (in the presence of Fe(III)) were used to derivatize asulam and sulfide, respectively.In the enrichment methods, the formed derivatives were preconcentrated into microdroplets of the in situ formed water insoluble ionic liquid (IL), 1-hexyl-3-methylimidazoliu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparative characteristics of the developed method with the methods proposed in the literature for the sulfide determination combined with different microextraction techniques are given in Table 3 . In contrast to dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction, 9 the proposed method has better selectivity due to the absence of contact between the donor and acceptor phases. Application of this method also simplifies the procedure of the analysis and reduces the analysis time, since optical probe permits to avoid the stage of transferring the analyte to the microcuvette and a time-consuming and complicated preparation stage before analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparative characteristics of the developed method with the methods proposed in the literature for the sulfide determination combined with different microextraction techniques are given in Table 3 . In contrast to dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction, 9 the proposed method has better selectivity due to the absence of contact between the donor and acceptor phases. Application of this method also simplifies the procedure of the analysis and reduces the analysis time, since optical probe permits to avoid the stage of transferring the analyte to the microcuvette and a time-consuming and complicated preparation stage before analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the procedure and its capacity to retain quantitative recovery under different sample conditions, it is important to determine the effect of the presence of coexisting ions. [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] Herein, the effects of the presence of Na + , K + , Mg 2+ , Ca 2+ , Co 2+ , Ni 2+ , Cu 2+ , Fe 3+ , Zn 2+ , Cl À , CO 3 2À , NO 3 À , SO 4 2À and F À were investigated. The results are presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Effect Of Coexisting Cations and Anionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many instrumental approaches, such as electroanalytical methods, flame (FAAS) and electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry and inductively coupled plasma, hyphenated with optical emission and mass spectrometry are being widely employed for the analysis of trace quantity of heavy metal ions in different media [26][27][28][29][30][31]. Among these techniques, FAAS is being M a n u s c r i p t extensively used for the analysis of low levels of metal analytes, due to comparatively uncomplicated and low cost apparatus required [32][33][34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%