1985
DOI: 10.1002/ctpp.19850250508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ionization Cross Sections of Gas Molecules for Plasma Chemistry

Abstract: Using the recently tested formula of GRYZINSKI electron impact ionization cross sections for several molecules are calculated. The additivity rule and the statistical approach by FITCA and SAUTER are discweed. With new experimental ionization cross sections it is possible to derive the regression Coefficients also for P, As, B, and Si, which are presented together with the previously obtained values as a function of the atomic number. It appears to be possible to obtain coefficients for other atoms by interpol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where the ratio of experimental to calculated SF: is taken to be -100 (table 3, data set (3)). Thus for SF2 content of -0.2% in the glow, it is not unreasonable to obtain the high SFt ion intensity which we observe, Similarly for SF:, assuming that it is formed from dissociative ionization of SF,, kSF+jSFq was estimated to be 1.3 x 10-8cm3 s -I (for a = 0.17eV-3/2, b = 0.21 eV-l, = 12.7eV, c = 0.4 x 10~20m2eV-L (Deutsch and Schmidt 1985)) yielding a value for f = 0.012 or 1.2% of the SF, concentration. Although this value is somewhat higher than the value used in…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where the ratio of experimental to calculated SF: is taken to be -100 (table 3, data set (3)). Thus for SF2 content of -0.2% in the glow, it is not unreasonable to obtain the high SFt ion intensity which we observe, Similarly for SF:, assuming that it is formed from dissociative ionization of SF,, kSF+jSFq was estimated to be 1.3 x 10-8cm3 s -I (for a = 0.17eV-3/2, b = 0.21 eV-l, = 12.7eV, c = 0.4 x 10~20m2eV-L (Deutsch and Schmidt 1985)) yielding a value for f = 0.012 or 1.2% of the SF, concentration. Although this value is somewhat higher than the value used in…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…kSFf/SF1 SFJ/SFs f = --since no measured cross sections are available for electron impact ionization of SF,, and using the parameters a = 0.095 eV-'I2, 6 = 0.16eV-l, eth = 10.1 eV (table 4), and c = 0.25 X lo-" m2 e V 1 (taken from the calculated plot of Deutsch and Schmidt 1985), ki for reaction (9) was estimated to be 2.4 x 10-8cm3s-1. Then, using the following expression for the ratio of the experimental isF$ to the calculated isFIIsF6, iSFf kSF$/SF6nSF6 + kSF?lSF&SF6…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above data treatment was extended to include P, As, B, and Si atoms, was used to confirm a "fluorine anomaly" [171,[174][175][176], and served to derive empirical correction factors for previous supposedly additive cross-sections. Figure 1 in ref.…”
Section: Ionization Cross-sections Of Moleculesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a consequence of the enhanced efficiency with which singly and multiply charged ions other than C + 70 are produced from C 70 . We also note that the simple additivity rule [17,18] fails completely in this case, it would predict values more than three times higher than what is actually observed.…”
Section: A Absolute Ionization Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 42%