1997
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.55.r842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ionization ofAu78+and electron capture byAu79+

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

5
29
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
5
29
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For g above ϳ100, the ln g scaling will be valid and s ECPP A ln g 1 B, where A and B are predicted to be [4] independent of 1͞g. Total electron capture and loss measurements were reported recently by Claytor et al [12] for g 12.6-Au ions, but the ECPP mechanism is not prominent at this low g, and ln g scaling is not expected to be valid.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For g above ϳ100, the ln g scaling will be valid and s ECPP A ln g 1 B, where A and B are predicted to be [4] independent of 1͞g. Total electron capture and loss measurements were reported recently by Claytor et al [12] for g 12.6-Au ions, but the ECPP mechanism is not prominent at this low g, and ln g scaling is not expected to be valid.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each process has approximately the same dependence on the projectile atomic number, i.e., Z 5 p . The REC and NRC mechanisms, which dominate below the ultrarelativistic regime [11][12][13], become insignificant compared to ECPP when g . 100 even for high Z t .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting best fit of the K-REC cross section per target electron is shown in Fig. 4, where it is compared, and found to agree well, with extrapolation to lower energy measurements, especially those of Claytor et al [20], according to rigorous relativistic calculations by Eichler et al [15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Other ionization measurements for heavy ions near this energy regime were also performed by Claytor et al [20] at the brookhaven AGS for 10.8-GeV/nucleon Au ions. They observed good agreement with Anholt and Becker predictions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…At storage rings, of course, the ionization of the projectiles leads to a loss of the ions from the beam and, hence, has been explored in great detail, both by theory and experiment (Eichler andMeyerhof 1995, Voitkiv 2004). In the past, however, most experiments focused on the total ionization cross sections which have been measured not only for the intermediate energies of the projectiles (Rymuza et al 1993, Scheidenberger et al 1994, Stöhlker et al 1997 but also for the highrelativistic (Claytor et al 1997) and even the ultra-relativistic (Krause et al 1998, 2001, Vane et al 2000 ion-atom collisions. These experimental data are usually compared with the predictions from the first-order perturbation theory, based on the semi-classical (Pauli et al 1978, Amundsen and Aashamar 1981, Valluri et al 1984, Halabuka et al 1994 as well as the plane-wave Born (Anholt et al 1985, Voitkiv et al 2000, Voitkiv 2004 approximations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%