1972
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9169(72)90157-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ionospheric effects of two recent solar eclipses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theoretical predictions of the response of the F region to this eclipse were also made by Stubbe [1970]. A satisfactory agreement with previous experimental work was found for the F2 region, but not for this eclipse [see Marriott et al, 1972]. In order to simulate the eclipse behavior of the F2 region for this eclipse, Flaherty et al This eclipse did, however, appear to generate waves which propagated away from the bow wave.…”
Section: This Results Is In Contrast To That Of Klobuchar Andsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Theoretical predictions of the response of the F region to this eclipse were also made by Stubbe [1970]. A satisfactory agreement with previous experimental work was found for the F2 region, but not for this eclipse [see Marriott et al, 1972]. In order to simulate the eclipse behavior of the F2 region for this eclipse, Flaherty et al This eclipse did, however, appear to generate waves which propagated away from the bow wave.…”
Section: This Results Is In Contrast To That Of Klobuchar Andsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Thus there would be no solar radiation reaching the earth atmosphere if the photosphere is totally obscured. However it is well known that some of the solar soft‐X‐ray and EUV radiation which originates from the solar corona is not obscured during a solar eclipse [ Rishbeth , 1968; Marriott et al , 1972; Davis et al , 2000, 2001; Curto et al , 2006]. Davis et al [2000] presented a method for the first time to estimate the percentage of the solar ionizing radiation which remains unobscured during the eclipse by comparing the variation of the ionospheric E‐layer with the observed behaviors during a control day and found that the flux of solar ionizing radiation fell to a minimum of 25 ± 2% of the value before and after the eclipse for the 11 August 1999 eclipse.…”
Section: Solar Radiation During An Eclipsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The occurrence of a solar eclipse provides the opportunity to study the response of the Earth's ionized atmosphere to large, but short-lived, changes in the solar input. Previous eclipse studies have been used to determine production and recombination rate coefficients in the E and F1 regions [Ratcliffe, 1956;Minnis, 1958;Marriott et al, 1972], while the anomalous electron density behavior near the F2 peak observed during early eclipse studies highlighted the importance of transport effects above these altitudes [Ratcliffe and Weekes, 1960]. Other eclipse studies have been used to map the sources of ionizing radiation on the Sun [Minnis, 1958;Rishbeth, 1968;Horvarth and Theon, 1972;Brace et al, 1972].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%