2021
DOI: 10.1029/2020ja028368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ionospheric Response Over Brazil to the August 2018 Geomagnetic Storm as Probed by CSES‐01 and Swarm Satellites and by Local Ground‐Based Observations

Abstract: The geomagnetic storm that occurred on 25 August 25 2018, that is, during the minimum of solar cycle 24, is currently the strongest ever probed by the first China Seismo‐Electromagnetic Satellite (CSES‐01). By integrating the in situ measurements provided by CSES‐01 (orbiting at altitude of 507 km) and by Swarm A satellite (orbiting at ca., 460 km) with ground‐based observations (ionosondes, magnetometers, and Global Navigation Satellite System receivers), we investigate the ionospheric response at lower‐ and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(176 reference statements)
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the MTA was located inside the South Atlantic Magnetic Anomaly (SAMA), where the total magnetic field decreases. This region is characterized by a strong longitudinal dependence on low latitude electrodynamics (Abdu et al, 2005;Spogli et al, 2021) and by ionospheric irregularities' formation due to precipitating particles from the near proton belt, which may act as a further source of GNSS signal degradation (see, e.g., Spogli et al, 2013a), including Loss of Lock (Damaceno et al, 2020). Red lines in Figure 2 indicate the approximate position of the magnetic parallel and meridian passing over PRU1 as retrieved by calculating the declination angle from IGRF-12 (Thébault et al, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the MTA was located inside the South Atlantic Magnetic Anomaly (SAMA), where the total magnetic field decreases. This region is characterized by a strong longitudinal dependence on low latitude electrodynamics (Abdu et al, 2005;Spogli et al, 2021) and by ionospheric irregularities' formation due to precipitating particles from the near proton belt, which may act as a further source of GNSS signal degradation (see, e.g., Spogli et al, 2013a), including Loss of Lock (Damaceno et al, 2020). Red lines in Figure 2 indicate the approximate position of the magnetic parallel and meridian passing over PRU1 as retrieved by calculating the declination angle from IGRF-12 (Thébault et al, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diurnal variation can be conveniently isolated from longer period variations by using the appropriate filter procedure. In our case, we used the moving average, which represents a simple and efficient method for identifying long trends (e.g., [22,23,34,35]). In this regard, since diurnal variations have a periodicity of 24 h (and its sub-harmonics, 12, 8, 6, 4 h, and so on), we computed the moving average over 3 days: this value is sufficient to efficiently suppress the daily variations and not too large to include sub-harmonics of 27-day Sun's synodic rotation period (see in particular [36,37]).…”
Section: Diurnal Variation and Its Seasonal Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we applied the semi-automated procedure developed by Del Corpo et al [70] to the pair DUR-LMP to determine FLRs during two geomagnetic storms: 5-11 September 2017 [22] and 23-29 August 2018 [23]. The procedure basically searches for a maximum in the ∆φ spectra and then checks if at the same frequency the typical amplitude ratio pattern is matched.…”
Section: Observation Of Field Line Resonancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ΔEEF is derived by the application of a digital filter that allows mapping the interplanetary electric field (IEF) retrieved from Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE) satellite data through a transfer function model (Manoj et al, 2008;Manoj & Maus, 2012). Such kind of approach to model EEF disturbance, supported by IMF-Bz, has been proven to be effective in enabling investigation of the role of PPEFs in the storm-time behavior of the Equatorial Electrojet (EEJ) (e.g., Spogli et al, 2020, Alfonsi et al, 2021. Moreover, AE is here used to speculate about the behavior of Joule and particle heating possibly leading to storm-time neutral winds triggering DDEFs (Yamazaki and Maute, 2017) According to Figure 5, the IMF-Bz component was flipping between positive and negative values until 05:32 UT on 01 November, remaining negative from this time until 01:08 UT on 02 November.…”
Section: Effect Of a Geomagnetic Stormmentioning
confidence: 99%