2018
DOI: 10.1029/2017rs006424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ionospheric Scintillation Observation Using Space‐Borne Synthetic Aperture Radar Data

Abstract: Networks of ground-based global navigation satellite system (GNSS) receivers have been widely used to monitor scintillation caused by irregularities in the disturbed ionosphere. Due to the relative sparseness of such networks, however, scintillation measurements are lacking in many regions of the globe, and even in well-instrumented geographic areas, the spacing between receivers is often too large to study the systematic spatial changes in scintillation characteristics, for example, across the equatorial anom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average S4 measured at Tirunelveli station is 0.21 on March 23, 2015 (Mohanty, et al 2018). This has been computed taking into account all the satellites observed at the station within a three-hour time window (17:30 to 20:30 UT) and satisfied a criterion.…”
Section: Comparison Of S4 Estimated From Sar and Measured From Gpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The average S4 measured at Tirunelveli station is 0.21 on March 23, 2015 (Mohanty, et al 2018). This has been computed taking into account all the satellites observed at the station within a three-hour time window (17:30 to 20:30 UT) and satisfied a criterion.…”
Section: Comparison Of S4 Estimated From Sar and Measured From Gpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same applies to satellites to the east of the SAR track post 1900 UT. Details of measurement of the plasma drift and the selection of GPS satellites to be included in the study are explained and given in (Mohanty, et al 2018). The slight variation in S4 measured from GPS and that estimated from SAR pairs is due to the difference in position of the ionospheric pierce points of the satellites and SAR.…”
Section: Comparison Of S4 Estimated From Sar and Measured From Gpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deformation of SAR images is characterized by stripe‐like structures aligned with the local geomagnetic fields, which can stretch over 1,000 km. Although a recent report shows that SAR and GPS scintillation were observed on the same night in the Indian sector (Mohanty et al., 2018), the origin of SAR scintillation and its possible relation to EPBs are not yet observationally evident due to the lack of simultaneous observation of ionospheric density depletions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…observed on the same night in the Indian sector (Mohanty et al, 2018), the origin of SAR scintillation and its possible relation to EPBs are not yet observationally evident due to the lack of simultaneous observation of ionospheric density depletions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This effect is used to estimate TEC and to produce TEC map from SAR acquisitions [4]. Furthermore, the ionospheric scintillation parameter S 4 is estimated using two SAR acquisitions on two different dates [5] in India. The estimated S 4 is compared with the one measured by GNSS receivers positioned along the orbit of the space-borne SAR sensor and the results are qualitatively consistent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%