The NMDA receptor (NMDAR) is known to transmit important information by conducting calcium ions. However, some recent studies suggest that activation of NMDARs can trigger synaptic plasticity in the absence of ion flow. Does ligand binding transmit information to signaling molecules that mediate synaptic plasticity? Using Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) imaging of fluorescently tagged proteins expressed in neurons, conformational signaling is identified within the NMDAR complex that is essential for downstream actions. Ligand binding transiently reduces FRET between the NMDAR cytoplasmic domain (cd) and the associated protein phosphatase 1 (PP1), requiring NMDARcd movement, and persistently reduces FRET between the NMDARcd and calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII), a process requiring PP1 activity. These studies directly monitor agonist-driven conformational signaling at the NMDAR complex required for synaptic plasticity.A gonist binding to the NMDAR is required for two major forms of synaptic plasticity: long-term potentiation (LTP) and longterm depression (LTD) (1). Surprisingly, activation of NMDARs can produce plasticity in opposite directions, with LTP enhancing transmission and LTD reducing transmission. A model was developed (2, 3) to explain how activation of NMDAR could produce these opposing phenomena: strong stimuli during LTP induction drive a large flux of Ca 2+ through NMDARs, leading to a large increase in intracellular calcium ion concentration ([Ca 2+ ] i ) that activates one series of biochemical steps leading to synaptic potentiation; a weaker stimulus during LTD induction drives a more reduced flux of Ca 2+ through NMDARs, producing a modest increase in [Ca 2+ ] i that activates a different series of biochemical steps, leading to synaptic depression. However, this model is not consistent with recent studies suggesting that no change in [Ca 2+ ] i is required for LTD, and instead invokes metabotropic signaling by the NMDAR (4). Studies supporting an ion-flow-independent role for NMDARs in LTD (4-7) and other processes (7-13) stand in contrast to studies proposing that flow of Ca 2+ through NMDAR is required for LTD (14)
Results
Transient NMDAR Agonist Binding Without Ion Flux DepressesSpontaneous Excitatory Postsynaptic Currents. In the accompanying study (16), Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET)-fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) imaging was used to show that agonist binding to the NMDAR produces conformational movement of the NMDARcd. This effect displayed the same pharmacological profile as the electrically induced LTD recently published (4) and independently confirmed (7), suggesting that the conformational changes measured in the NMDARcd are associated with LTD induction. To test whether the stimulation protocol that drives conformational changes in the NMDARcd produces changes in synaptic function, spontaneous synaptic activity was recorded in primary hippocampal neurons, and NMDA was transiently applied in the presence of 7CK, a noncompetit...