2019
DOI: 10.1109/mwc.2019.1800297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IoT Applications and Services in Space Information Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the complexity of the proposed method remains low, because the large amount of steps are only needed for training phases, and the optimal offloading decision and resource allocation can be achieved based on the trained Q-network without iterations. The convergence process of total cost, as discussed in (7) and calculated by the weighted-sum of latency and energy, is showed in Fig. 3.…”
Section: A Convergence Of Juaod-oramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the complexity of the proposed method remains low, because the large amount of steps are only needed for training phases, and the optimal offloading decision and resource allocation can be achieved based on the trained Q-network without iterations. The convergence process of total cost, as discussed in (7) and calculated by the weighted-sum of latency and energy, is showed in Fig. 3.…”
Section: A Convergence Of Juaod-oramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [6], heterogenous space and terrestrial integrated networks for IoT is given and analyzed with several research challenges. The typical IoT applications and services in space information networks are given in [7], and four types of traffic are classified according to the delay tolerance. In [8], the internet of space things is introduced with software defined networking (SDN) and network function virtualization (NFV).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The monitoring of buildings relies on the use of lightweight, reliable, and open network stacks, enabling interoperability and lowering integration costs. On this topic, the use of Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT) or Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) protocols is a de facto standard [25] because they can provide lightweight solutions for IoT data exchanges in an energy efficient manner. The Publish / Subscribe (PUB/SUB) paradigm, connecting data publishers to data consumers through a rendezvous entity, allows flexible and customisable implementations.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the data collected from the sensor nodes is delivered to the remote server by means of MQTT, an IoT protocol for reliable data exchanges that decouples data producers from data consumers by means of a rendezvous node, referred to as broker. MQTT offers intrinsically reliable data exchanges because it is TCP-based, contrarily to the plain version of CoAP [25], [32], an UDPbased solution for RESTful data exchanges.…”
Section: Monitoring Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, IETF has proposed the use of Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) (RFC 7252), which relies on UDP and implements a request/response style. When used over satellite links, CoAP outperforms MQTT on random access channels [9,8]. Moreover, the authors of [39] proposed an integration of CoAP and MQTT over LoRaWAN, even though such application layer protocols cause extra overhead in terms of payload size, thus undermining the already limited performance of DtS-IoT links.…”
Section: Upper Layersmentioning
confidence: 99%