2019
DOI: 10.3390/s19245541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IoTNet: An Efficient and Accurate Convolutional Neural Network for IoT Devices

Abstract: Two main approaches exist when deploying a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) on resource-constrained IoT devices: either scale a large model down or use a small model designed specifically for resource-constrained environments. Small architectures typically trade accuracy for computational cost by performing convolutions as depth-wise convolutions rather than standard convolutions like in large networks. Large models focus primarily on state-of-the-art performance and often struggle to scale down sufficiently… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
26
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…11(a) shows that for CIFAR-10 the ResNet18_PSD1_P16 increases accuracy to 92% compared to the baseline MobileNetV2 (ShuffleNet) accuracy of 90.3% (∼89%). Note that our obtained accuracies are also superior than reported in [48] and only around 1% less than the accuracy reported in [49] which was trained for 180 additional epochs. The pre-defined sparse CNN model VGG16_PSD1_P8 With 0.073 G FLOPs, has approximately 1.24× (1.34×) fewer computation complexity yet still outperforms MobileNetV2 (ShuffleNet) in terms of accuracy.…”
Section: Performance Comparison With Shufflenet and Mo-bilenetv2contrasting
confidence: 56%
“…11(a) shows that for CIFAR-10 the ResNet18_PSD1_P16 increases accuracy to 92% compared to the baseline MobileNetV2 (ShuffleNet) accuracy of 90.3% (∼89%). Note that our obtained accuracies are also superior than reported in [48] and only around 1% less than the accuracy reported in [49] which was trained for 180 additional epochs. The pre-defined sparse CNN model VGG16_PSD1_P8 With 0.073 G FLOPs, has approximately 1.24× (1.34×) fewer computation complexity yet still outperforms MobileNetV2 (ShuffleNet) in terms of accuracy.…”
Section: Performance Comparison With Shufflenet and Mo-bilenetv2contrasting
confidence: 56%
“…In future directions, other hybrid leader breeding mechanisms will be explored to further enhance performance. Moreover, we also aim to evaluate the proposed models using complex computer vision tasks, e.g., deep architecture generation for object detection and classification [ 51 , 73 , 74 , 75 ] as well as image description generation [ 76 , 77 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…dermoscopic lesion localization and segmentation, nuclei counting and segmentation, MRI brain tumour segmentation, and stroke lesion segmentation based on acute CT perfusion images. We will also study the application of the proposed PSO model to other complex computer vision tasks, such as evolving deep architecture generation for image description and visual question generation [82][83][84][85] for resource-constrained deployments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%