“…Five RCTs
44,
49–
52 , and all the included CTs and CSS, as well as 22 of the 23 SGS, displayed a high risk of bias due to inadequate generation of a randomised sequence, while four RCTs
23,
33,
42,
53 showed low risk of bias, and three RCTs
41,
54,
55 , as well as one SGS
56 , showed unclear risk of bias because there was no description of the method used for allocation (even though the participants were said to be “randomly” assigned). Six RCTs
23,
42,
49,
50,
52,
53 displayed low risk of bias for “allocation concealment”, while two
44,
54 showed unclear risk of bias because of the lack of description of the randomization allocation. Also, four RCTs
33,
41,
51,
55 , and all the included CTs and SGS, as well as CSS, showed high risk of bias due to the lack of concealment of allocations before assignment.…”