2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12520-020-01072-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iron and oxygen isotope systematics during corrosion of iron objects: a first approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Opposite to what we observed, biosynthesis of hydrogen containing molecules typically leads to enrichment of 2 H in the remaining water [ 97 ]. Isotope fractionation of oxygen in water during the corrosion of iron metal is poorly understood, especially at low temperature [ 104 ]. Isotope fractionation in reactions producing molecular hydrogen, such as oxidation of iron minerals, generally lead to extreme 2 H depletion in the H 2 gas (e.g., Lin et al (2005) [ 105 ]), and thus cannot account for the observed 2 H depletion in water.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Opposite to what we observed, biosynthesis of hydrogen containing molecules typically leads to enrichment of 2 H in the remaining water [ 97 ]. Isotope fractionation of oxygen in water during the corrosion of iron metal is poorly understood, especially at low temperature [ 104 ]. Isotope fractionation in reactions producing molecular hydrogen, such as oxidation of iron minerals, generally lead to extreme 2 H depletion in the H 2 gas (e.g., Lin et al (2005) [ 105 ]), and thus cannot account for the observed 2 H depletion in water.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, this illustrates the need to analyse iron samples not corroded by seawater for archaeological provenance studies. Rose et al (2020) reached an opposite conclusion and argued for the absence of Fe isotope fractionation during the corrosion of iron artefacts. However, we consider that these authors most likely missed significant fractionation between corroded and not corroded samples because of insufficiently precise and accurate Fe isotope measurements.…”
Section: Corroded Iron Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, they did not report Fe isotope determinations of (geological) reference materials, as done here and in our previous work (Milot et al, 2016) to assess data accuracy. The analytical uncertainties reported by Rose et al (2020) are thus most likely underestimated, hence the reason why they could not see the small isotopic effect imparted by iron corrosion, although the way corrosion was sampled and compared with non-corroded iron bars could be another explanation.…”
Section: Corroded Iron Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Nevertheless, some studies showed negligible isotope fractionation (within experimental error) for metal objects made of, for instance, Fe, Sn or Pb. [5][6][7] Different approaches based on the use of (trace) element patterns have been widely used for assessing the provenance of metal artefacts. 8,9 However, interpretation of such elemental ngerprints is oen not straightforward, especially when dealing with elements that have different affinities for metal and slag.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Nevertheless, some studies showed negligible isotope fractionation (within experimental error) for metal objects made of, for instance, Fe, Sn or Pb. 5–7…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%