2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2020.104534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iron oxide mineralogy in Mollisols, Aridisols and Entisols from southwestern Pampean region (Argentina) by environmental magnetism approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These ranges fall within the reported values for magnetite (8.0-69.5 mT, Peters and Dekkers 2003). Although H cr may vary with grain size of magnetic minerals, a mixture of low-and high-coercivity minerals may also lead to slight variations in H cr as reported by Chaparro and Sinito (2004), Chaparro et al (2020a), and references therein. Mean (and SD) values are similar for both campaigns and are interpreted in term of a common PM production source: traffic pollution.…”
Section: Magnetic Particles On Lichen's Thallussupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These ranges fall within the reported values for magnetite (8.0-69.5 mT, Peters and Dekkers 2003). Although H cr may vary with grain size of magnetic minerals, a mixture of low-and high-coercivity minerals may also lead to slight variations in H cr as reported by Chaparro and Sinito (2004), Chaparro et al (2020a), and references therein. Mean (and SD) values are similar for both campaigns and are interpreted in term of a common PM production source: traffic pollution.…”
Section: Magnetic Particles On Lichen's Thallussupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Hard IRM, or HIRM, signifies the proportion of high-coercivity magnetic minerals. The L-ratio values for the samples of lake L6 remain nearly constant showing only minor variations (1.0–1.21) (Supplemental Figure S2) indicating that the HIRM values are dominantly controlled by the varying concentrations of hematite (Chaparro et al, 2020; Liu et al, 2007). The HIRM values range from 7.05 to 502.85 × 10 −5 A m 2 kg −1 , with an average (±sd) of 40.2 (±64.09) × 10 −5 A m 2 kg −1 (Figure 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dunlop, 1995, Heider et al, 1996Roberts, et al, 2000;Evans and Heller, 2003;Hrouda, 2011;Jordanova, 2016). However, the low χ, χ ARM , and IRM values suggest that these finer magnetic phases likely take the form of the magnetically weaker hematite or goethite rather than magnetite, as suggested by the high Fecontent, high L-ratio, and low S-Ratio values (Liu et al, 2007b;Chaparro et al, 2020;Stine et al, 2020) (Figures 2,3). The presence of SP phases within a magnetically depleted soil can be explained as an initial process of pedogenic formation of SPmagnetite grains, most of which are sequentially converted (oxidized) into a magnetically weaker phase with increasing weathering intensity, potentially due to relatively high soil temperature (Schwertmann, 1958;Liu et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2013;Jiang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Effects Of Provenance and Varying Weathering Intensity On Magnetic Enhancement Vs Magnetic Depletion In The Blackwater Draw Formmentioning
confidence: 99%