Infrastructure Systems for Nuclear Energy 2013
DOI: 10.1002/9781118536254.ch27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irradiation Effects on Concrete Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
38
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is almost consistent with the results of Dubrovskii et al (1966Dubrovskii et al ( , 1967Dubrovskii et al ( , 1968Dubrovskii et al ( , 1970, which concluded that compressive strength might be affected above a total fluence of ~5 × 10 19 n/cm 2 . On the contrary, Fujiwara et al (2009) and Kontani et al (2010) pointed out that Hilsdorf et al's (1978) experimental results included concrete or mortar that are not suitable for LWRs. Therefore, Maruyama et al (2013) summarized the relationship between neutron fluence and relative compressive strength ratio (Fc/Fco, ratio of the compressive strength of irradiated concrete to that of the reference concrete) for concrete or mortar applicable to concrete members in LWRs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result is almost consistent with the results of Dubrovskii et al (1966Dubrovskii et al ( , 1967Dubrovskii et al ( , 1968Dubrovskii et al ( , 1970, which concluded that compressive strength might be affected above a total fluence of ~5 × 10 19 n/cm 2 . On the contrary, Fujiwara et al (2009) and Kontani et al (2010) pointed out that Hilsdorf et al's (1978) experimental results included concrete or mortar that are not suitable for LWRs. Therefore, Maruyama et al (2013) summarized the relationship between neutron fluence and relative compressive strength ratio (Fc/Fco, ratio of the compressive strength of irradiated concrete to that of the reference concrete) for concrete or mortar applicable to concrete members in LWRs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Several studies (Dubrovskii et al 1967;Elluech et al 1971;Pedersen 1971;Hilsdorf et al 1978;Kontani et al 2010;Maruyama et al 2012;Field et al 2015) have suggested that the mechanism of concrete deterioration due to irradiation is aggregate expansion that originates from metamictization or amorphization of silicious rock minerals due to irradiation (Primak et al 1955;Primak 1958;Elluech et al 1971;Eby et al 1992;Bonnet et al 1994;Douillard and Duraud 1996;Bolse 1999;Ewing et al 2000). Due to aggregate expansion, the mortar matrix in concrete is damaged, resulting in deterioration of concrete's physical properties, such as compressive strength and Young's modulus, such as in the case of alkali-silica reaction in concrete (Giorla et al 2015;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in a national project organized by the Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization (partly a former organization in the NRA), the Hilsdorf compiled data were found to be unsuitable for this purpose because they did not cover the type of concrete used in LWRs (Kontani et al 2010). A national project has been launched to elucidate the effects of radiation on concrete properties and to develop a system for evaluating the integrity of concrete affected by radiation (Maruyama et al 2012).…”
Section: Japanese Conditions Issues and Concernsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In PLM and the inspection for extending the operation period, the integrity of concrete affected by radiation is evaluated with reference levels taken from data reported in Hilsdorf et al (1978) and interpreted by Kontani et al (2010): 1 × 10 20 n/cm 2 for fast neutrons and 2 × 10 5 kGy for gamma rays. However, in a national project organized by the Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization (partly a former organization in the NRA), the Hilsdorf compiled data were found to be unsuitable for this purpose because they did not cover the type of concrete used in LWRs (Kontani et al 2010).…”
Section: Japanese Conditions Issues and Concernsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation