2014
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irrelevant stimulus processing in ADHD: catecholamine dynamics and attentional networks

Abstract: A cardinal symptom of attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a general distractibility where children and adults shift their attentional focus to stimuli that are irrelevant to the ongoing behavior. This has been attributed to a deficit in dopaminergic signaling in cortico-striatal networks that regulate goal-directed behavior. Furthermore, recent imaging evidence points to an impairment of large scale, antagonistic brain networks that normally contribute to attentional engagement and disengage… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
(169 reference statements)
3
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the 36 independent components, 13 were found to be artifacts or noises upon visual inspection. Thus, 23 components were identified as anatomically and functionally meaningful networks, which was in accordance with previously reported networks (Aboitiz, Ossandon, Zamorano, Palma, & Carrasco, 2014; Green, Kraemer, Fugelsang, Gray, & Dunbar, 2010; Kahnt, Chang, Park, Heinzle, & Haynes, 2012; Kotz, Cappa, von Cramon, & Friederici, 2002; Mohanty et al., 2007; Nekovarova, Fajnerova, Horacek, & Spaniel, 2014; Nocchi et al., 2012; Rosazza et al., 2014; Spreng, Sepulcre, Turner, Stevens, & Schacter, 2012; Turken & Dronkers, 2011; Uddin, Clare Kelly, Biswal, Xavier Castellanos, & Milham, 2009; Wu, Liu, Hallett, Zheng, & Chan, 2013). …”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Among the 36 independent components, 13 were found to be artifacts or noises upon visual inspection. Thus, 23 components were identified as anatomically and functionally meaningful networks, which was in accordance with previously reported networks (Aboitiz, Ossandon, Zamorano, Palma, & Carrasco, 2014; Green, Kraemer, Fugelsang, Gray, & Dunbar, 2010; Kahnt, Chang, Park, Heinzle, & Haynes, 2012; Kotz, Cappa, von Cramon, & Friederici, 2002; Mohanty et al., 2007; Nekovarova, Fajnerova, Horacek, & Spaniel, 2014; Nocchi et al., 2012; Rosazza et al., 2014; Spreng, Sepulcre, Turner, Stevens, & Schacter, 2012; Turken & Dronkers, 2011; Uddin, Clare Kelly, Biswal, Xavier Castellanos, & Milham, 2009; Wu, Liu, Hallett, Zheng, & Chan, 2013). …”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…We based our analyses on the model of the SN as a between-network switching hub, as proposed by Menon and Uddin [15], which is differentiated from the attentional networks. Hence, we separated the SN, comprised of bilateral insula and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), from the VAN-DAN system [53,64]. The finding of a stronger SN-DAN anti-correlation in the control group, as well as a trend towards SN-VAN hyperconnectivity in the ADHD group, suggests a decreased brain network functional differentiation and adds to the frameworks where deficits in between brain networks balance are proposed to underlie ADHD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative to healthy adolescents, those with ADHD show reduced RAI scores and decreased SN-ECN connectivity (Cai et al, 2015; von Rhein et al, 2017). One hypotheses suggests that individuals with ADHD have an immature SN which may contribute to both a lack of proper task preparation and over-activation of the SN resulting in impulsivity (Aboitiz et al, 2014), which is a common trait noted in those with a substance abuse disorder (Belin et al, 2008). Further, adults with ADHD have been found to have enhanced SN connectivity with other brain regions such as the putamen, which the author interprets as contributing to enhanced sensitivity to external stimuli (Dongchuan, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%