2021
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021203089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irreversible Electroporation to Treat Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases (COLDFIRE-2): A Phase II, Two-Center, Single-Arm Clinical Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another study of 24 patients with unresectable CLM showed 3-and 5-year overall survival rates of 25% and 8.3%, respectively [62]. Recently, a phase II, single-arm clinical trial of unresectable CLM near critical structures reported a local control rate after 1 year following repeat IRE of 74%, and the overall complication rate was 40% [72]. Although this complication rate was substantially higher than most reports for the thermal ablation of CLM in less challenging locations, the authors inferred that most of the procedures having been performed simultaneously with surgery might be the cause of the high complication rate and not all of the reported adverse events were directly related to the IRE.…”
Section: Irreversible Electroporationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study of 24 patients with unresectable CLM showed 3-and 5-year overall survival rates of 25% and 8.3%, respectively [62]. Recently, a phase II, single-arm clinical trial of unresectable CLM near critical structures reported a local control rate after 1 year following repeat IRE of 74%, and the overall complication rate was 40% [72]. Although this complication rate was substantially higher than most reports for the thermal ablation of CLM in less challenging locations, the authors inferred that most of the procedures having been performed simultaneously with surgery might be the cause of the high complication rate and not all of the reported adverse events were directly related to the IRE.…”
Section: Irreversible Electroporationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are some differences in the 1-year LTP rate, the midterm results of our study with a 2-year LTP-free rate of almost 23% and a 3-year LTP-free rate of almost 20% are comparable with a previous study (2-year progression-free survival 18% [16]). To further evaluate and classify the advantages of IRE in the We can further conclude that heterogeneity in target tumor size, origin and overall tumor biology, patient population, especially regarding prior liver surgery, and operator experience, have all been identified as potential confounders and are all potential causes for the reported high variability of local efficacy rates [32,33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IRE is optimal for managing tumors smaller than 5 cm [ 55 ], indeed an important limitation is the incapability to completely ablate lesions larger than 5 cm without repeated attempts or repositioning of the electrodes [ 56 ]. A recent phase II study supports the potentiality of this technology in the CLM setting [ 57 ]. Due to the limitations of RFA and MWA on hilar tumors [ 58 ], despite a non-neglectable complication rate of IRE itself in this hard-to-reach CLM 57], the most likely future potential application of this technique will be as a niche indication in this setting.…”
Section: Interventional Treatment Options For Omd Crcmentioning
confidence: 92%