2014
DOI: 10.1051/ctv/20142902060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irrigation schedule on table grapes by stem water potential and vapor pressure deficit allows to optimize Water Use

Abstract: SUMMARYThis study tested the relationship between stem water potential (ψ stem ) and vapor pressure deficit (VPD) in order to evaluate its use as reference for irrigation control of table grape (Vitis vinifera) cvs. Thompson Seedless and Redglobe. Two trials were carried out on consecutive seasons. In the first season the treatments consisted of four different irrigation regimes: T1, plants irrigated at 100% of ETc; T2, irrigated until fruit set the same as T1 but after fruit set every other time T1; T3, plant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
7
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The relation between SWP and PLWP in grapevine has been shown to follow a linear function under both irrigated (Williams and Araujo, 2002; Williams and Trout, 2005) and rainfed (Zufferey and Murisier, 2007) conditions. At the same time, SWP is known to decrease with increasing vapor maximum deficit (VPD), but this relationship has been demonstrated to change over the growing season (Olivo et al, 2009) and to be different among and within species (McCutchan and Shackel, 1992; De Swaef et al, 2009; Rogiers et al, 2009; Marchin et al, 2016), and irrigation treatments (Williams and Baeza, 2007; Gálvez et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relation between SWP and PLWP in grapevine has been shown to follow a linear function under both irrigated (Williams and Araujo, 2002; Williams and Trout, 2005) and rainfed (Zufferey and Murisier, 2007) conditions. At the same time, SWP is known to decrease with increasing vapor maximum deficit (VPD), but this relationship has been demonstrated to change over the growing season (Olivo et al, 2009) and to be different among and within species (McCutchan and Shackel, 1992; De Swaef et al, 2009; Rogiers et al, 2009; Marchin et al, 2016), and irrigation treatments (Williams and Baeza, 2007; Gálvez et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Gálvez et al (2014) tested the implementation of deficit irrigation controlled on the basis of stem water potential and vapor pressure deficit (VPD) in the cvs 'Red globe' and 'Thompson Seedless'. Water use under DI was reduced in the cv.…”
Section: Effects Of Deficit Irrigation On Water Saving Wue Yield Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…70 %), or yet, to lower soil water availability as observed for the cv. 'Thompson Seedless' (Gálvez et al 2014).…”
Section: Effects Of Deficit Irrigation On Water Saving Wue Yield Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Entre sus ventajas destacan su menor variabilidad, mejor correlación con el déficit de presión de vapor (DPV) y que refleja mejor la disminución de agua en el suelo que Ψh. Diversos trabajos han puesto de manifiesto la utilidad de este indicador en diversos frutales como albaricoquero (Pérez-Sarmiento et al, 2010); granado ; olivo (Moriana et al, 2012); uva de mesa (Gálvez et al, 2014) y melocotonero (Abrisqueta et al, 2015).…”
Section: -Potencial Hídrico Foliar (ψ)unclassified