2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-006-0498-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is abundance a species attribute? An example with haematophagous ectoparasites

Abstract: Population density is a fundamental property of a species and yet it varies among populations of the same species. The variation comes from the interplay between intrinsic features of a species that tend to produce repeatable density values across all populations of the same species and extrinsic environmental factors that differ among localities and thus tend to produce spatial variation in density. Is inter-population variation in density too large for density to be considered a true species character? We ad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The extent of repeatability of parasite abundance within a host species is also similar among mammalian nematodes (22% of variation explained by differences among host species as opposed to within host species; Arneberg et al 1997), fleas (24%; Krasnov et al 2006) and mites (29%; this study). However, this percentage was lower in metazoan parasites of fish (13%; .…”
Section: Variability Of Abundance and Host Specificity In Gamasid Mitessupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The extent of repeatability of parasite abundance within a host species is also similar among mammalian nematodes (22% of variation explained by differences among host species as opposed to within host species; Arneberg et al 1997), fleas (24%; Krasnov et al 2006) and mites (29%; this study). However, this percentage was lower in metazoan parasites of fish (13%; .…”
Section: Variability Of Abundance and Host Specificity In Gamasid Mitessupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Relatively weak repeatability of prevalence, but not abundance, of various parasites was found among Wsh species by Poulin (2006). The repeatability of Xea abundance within the same host species was reported by Krasnov et al (2006a). Again, the repeatability of this parameter within the host species was weaker than that within Xea species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…To determine whether parameters of infestation are true attributes of either tick species and stage or host species, i.e., parameters that vary less among populations of the same tick species and stage or the host species than among diVerent tick species and stages or diVerent hosts, respectively, we performed repeatability analyses (Arneberg et al 1997;Krasnov et al 2005cKrasnov et al , 2006aPoulin 2006). First, we analyzed the variation in tick stage abundance, prevalence and the level of aggregation by one-way analyses of variance (ANOVAs) within and across host species, with tick species and stage as independent factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyses of species co-occurrences using presence/absence matrices, rather than abundance data, are commonly accepted in community ecology mainly because measurements of occurrences are more certain than measurements of abundances (Gotelli and McCabe 2002;Gotelli and Rohde 2002; but see Hausdorf and Hennig 2007). The use of abundance data for Xea communities could lead to biased results because abundance has been shown to be a true species attribute in these insects, although it varies somewhat within the bounds set by species-speciWc life history traits (Krasnov et al 2006b). In other words, comparison of abundances among Xea species is problematic.…”
Section: Data Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%