1996
DOI: 10.1097/00002341-199606000-00034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Aggressive Surgical Management Justified in the Treatment of Merkel Cell Carcinoma?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…14,19 Prognostic factors associated with overall survival were reported in 12 series, including the present one. The most consistent of these was the stage of disease at presentation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…14,19 Prognostic factors associated with overall survival were reported in 12 series, including the present one. The most consistent of these was the stage of disease at presentation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…In our experience and that of others, 14,19 the outcome is dismal, with 3-year overall survival of only 31%. Because most patients die from distant metastatic disease, effective adjuvant systemic treatment is necessary to improve survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 41%
“…Nevertheless, aggressive locoregional treatment, that is, wide local excision of the primary lesion with a lateral margin of at least 3 cm, combined with early elective (especially in patients with head and neck lesions) or early therapeutic lymph node dissection has been recommended by many authors. 10,[21][22][23][24] Patients with localized disease in areas where surgery could cause unacceptable cosmesis or significant functional disability and compromised quality of life create a dilemma for the clinicians and patients. For example, 1 of the patients in this study presented with a 1.5-cm Merkel cell carcinoma in the nasal ala. Should she undergo definitive radiation or surgical resection?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The surgeon must not rely upon clinical appearance even in well-defined basal cell carcinomas. • Recommendations for treatment of melanoma with Breslow thickness >1.5 mm and Merkel cell carcinoma [13] cannot be deducted from the small number in the series. • There was no evidence for additional elective lymph node dissection nor oncological treatment in squamous cell carcinomas or melanomas in this series.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%