1999
DOI: 10.1017/s0003598x00087937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is archaeological valuation an accounting matter?

Abstract: How can a value be put on the past? This article promotes discussion of how archaeologists and museum curators are being forced into providing valuations for their ‘resource’ and collections, and conforming to accounting practices.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The max is the current planned installed capacity [25]. Tc (5,6,10) The original plan is 5 years [26]. According to the WCD Survey, about 40% of the delayed projects show a 1-year delay; 5% show a 5-year delay [1].…”
Section: Ibidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The max is the current planned installed capacity [25]. Tc (5,6,10) The original plan is 5 years [26]. According to the WCD Survey, about 40% of the delayed projects show a 1-year delay; 5% show a 5-year delay [1].…”
Section: Ibidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are many studies on how to place values on archaeological sites, there is no simple conclusion for this argument (Carman et al [12]; Carver [11]; Darvil et al [13]; Lipe [14]; Schaafsma [15]). …”
Section: Ac (Accident Cost)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, it should be understood that such resources, which possess heritage, cultural scientific, educative, recreational and other nonfinancial values, are 'unstable' when they are misclassified, through recognition as 'assets', in statements of financial position (Thompson 1979;Carman 1996;Carman et al 1999). In other words, durable, long-lasting community resources are treated as transient financial resources through what is, in effect, a miscategorising of those resources on their recognition as 'assets' in general purpose financial reports.…”
Section: Are 'Community Assets' Financial Resources Of Local Governmementioning
confidence: 99%