Is care really shared? A systematic review of collaborative care (shared care) interventions for adult cancer patients with depression

Abstract

Background Collaborative care involves active engagement of primary care and hospital physicians in shared care of patients beyond usual discharge summaries. This enhances community-based care and reduces dependence on specialists and hospitals. The model, successfully implemented in chronic care management, may have utility for treatment of depression in cancer. The aim of this systematic review was to identify components, delivery and roles and responsibilities within collaborative interventions for depression in the context of cancer. Methods Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Library and Central Register for Controlled Trials databases were searched to identify studies of randomised controlled trials comparing a treatment intervention that met the definition of collaborative model of depression care with usual care or other control condition. Studies of adult cancer patients with major depression or a non-bipolar depressive disorder published in English between 2005 and January 2018 were included. Cochrane checklist for risk of bias was completed (Study Prospero registration: CRD42018086515). Results Of 8 studies identified, none adhered to the definition of ‘collaborative care’. Interventions delivered were multi-disciplinary, with care co-ordinated by nurses ( n = 5) or social workers ( n = 2) under the direction of psychiatrists ( n = 7). Care was primarily delivered in cancer centres ( n = 5). Care co-ordinators advised primary care physicians (GPs) of medication changes ( n = 3) but few studies ( n = 2) actively involved GPs in medication prescribing and management. Conclusions This review highlighted joint participation of GPs and specialist care physicians in collaborative care depression management is promoted but not achieved in cancer care. Current models reflect hospital-based multi-disciplinary models of care. Protocol registration The protocol for this systematic review has been registered with PROSPERO. The registration number is CRD42018086515. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-019-3946-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The impact of shared decision-making on the treatment of anxiety and depressive disorders: systematic review

“…Collaborative care is considered a patient-centred approach, involving the use of a multidisciplinary behavioural healthcare team, typically led by a primary healthcare provider. [34][35][36] Collaborative care typically recommends incorporating patient goals into the treatment plan, but may not explicitly recommend or measure SDM. 37 Third, studies of SDM facilitated by decision aids were analysed separately in a post hoc analysis.…”

Recurrent major depressive disorder's impact on end-of-life care of cancer: A nationwide study

“…RMDD was associated with a 3-year earlier death consistently with higher level of comorbidities in RMDD (Walker et al, 2015). RMDD comorbidities may negatively influence the prognosis of cancer by increased complexity of treatment and necessity of close collaboration with primary care providers already known as insufficient (Shaw et al, 2019).…”

Anxiety disorders and mood disorders in hospital doctors: a literature review

“…Prevention should, therefore, target these factors. This is all the more important since hospital doctors must work within a doctors' network and be able to attend to their patients, to listen to them, and to see the mode of communication based on empathy or humor being put to work [58,59].…”