2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00234-018-2038-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is deep brain involvement in intracranial primary central nervous system lymphoma of importance for penetration of chemotherapeutic agents?

Abstract: In intracranial PCNSL, the only significant prognostic factor for OS and PFS in multivariate analysis was age and deep brain involvement. While contingent on a small study sample, we hypothesize this may in part be explained by regional differences in vascular supply and delivery from a dysfunctional perfusion signature.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, patients over 60 were more likely to be prescribed a boost compared to younger patients ≤60 (81.8% versus 50%, respectively), and patients over 60 made up the majority of the patients receiving a boost (64.3%) compared with just 40% of the patients not receiving a boost. Increasing age is a negative prognostic factor, and it is interesting to note that in our cohort, survival and response outcomes were slightly better among patients who received a boost, despite there being a higher proportion of older patients in this group [ 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Interestingly, patients over 60 were more likely to be prescribed a boost compared to younger patients ≤60 (81.8% versus 50%, respectively), and patients over 60 made up the majority of the patients receiving a boost (64.3%) compared with just 40% of the patients not receiving a boost. Increasing age is a negative prognostic factor, and it is interesting to note that in our cohort, survival and response outcomes were slightly better among patients who received a boost, despite there being a higher proportion of older patients in this group [ 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rates of boost implementation was not found to differ based on lesion number, with 50% of patients with solitary lesions and 50% of patients with multiple lesions prescribed a boost. Prior studies have failed to demonstrate that the number of brain lesions in patients with PCNSL is an independent prognostic factor for survival or response [ 20 , 21 , 22 ]. That being said, we recognize that for our specific cohort of patients, we can not definitively state that our outcomes were not affected by the higher proportion of patients with multiple lesions represented in the WBRT >30 Gy treatment group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conflicting evidence also exists for the possible negative prognostic value of the anatomic tumour size at baseline [29,34]. Number of enhancing lesions, cortical invasion and contrast enhancement pattern have not been linked to poorer outcomes [5 ▪ ,32,33].…”
Section: Neuroradiological Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risk factors for poor outcomes include impaired immune status, increased patient age, poor clinical performance, and the non-receipt or failure of first-line chemotherapy [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. In addition, a negative prognostic role has been postulated for the involvement of deep brain structures [ 24 , 25 , 26 ]. In contrast, analyses of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) have yielded controversial or inconclusive results [ 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ] and were found to differ between CNS and non-CNS lymphoma [ 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%