2020
DOI: 10.7146/ntfk.v107i1.124800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is digital crime victimization increasing in Iceland – may the Me-too movement influence how victimization is experienced

Abstract: The first Icelandic study of digital crime victimization was conducted in 2016. According to the results, approximately 13 % of respondents reported digital victimization during the three years prior to the survey. Slander and consumer fraud were the most common types of victimization. Respondents between the ages of 30 to 44 were most likely to have been victimized. In 2018, the survey was repeated using the same questionnaire. As before, the survey was conducted online in cooperation with the Social Sciences… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies found that factors such as perceived control over personal data, privacy and data protection, and perceived benefits such as convenience, efficiency, security and fraud prevention can influence public acceptance of DII. Demographic factors such as age, gender, education and income level also play a role in public acceptance of NDII [23,24]. However, in the Malaysian context where the NDII is yet to be fully implemented, there is limited knowledge on the level of public awareness, perception and acceptance of the initiative.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies found that factors such as perceived control over personal data, privacy and data protection, and perceived benefits such as convenience, efficiency, security and fraud prevention can influence public acceptance of DII. Demographic factors such as age, gender, education and income level also play a role in public acceptance of NDII [23,24]. However, in the Malaysian context where the NDII is yet to be fully implemented, there is limited knowledge on the level of public awareness, perception and acceptance of the initiative.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%