“…Weaknesses compared to control levels in literacy and phonological measures were as large, if not larger, amongst the other SEN groups, particularly the SLD and MLD groups (see Figure 1). These data were consistent with findings for deficits in literacy (reading and spelling) and phonological processing (awareness, memory and rapid access) amongst children with generally low scores on IQ-based tests (Ellis et al, 1996;Share, 1996;Siegel, 1988;Stanovich & Siegel, 1994;Stanovich & Stanovich, 1997) and amongst children with a history of language impairments (Bishop et al, 1999;Briscoe, Bishop, & Norbury, 2001;Catts et al, 2002;Goulandris, Snowling, & Walker, 2000;Van Alphen et al, 2004;Wiig, Zureich, & Chan, 2000). The findings of such studies, and the data reported in the present paper, suggest that either the majority of children with dyslexia, MLD and SLD should be treated identically in educational programmes designed to remediate literacy-related weaknesses or that further measures need to be considered to specifically differentiate each of these SEN groups from normal development.…”