2009
DOI: 10.1097/meg.0b013e32831a86f8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is female sex a significant favorable prognostic factor in hepatocellular carcinoma?

Abstract: HCC in females has better prognosis, but this is possibly more because of higher compliance with surveillance than to real biological differences.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

11
59
3
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
11
59
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to our data, concurrent hepatitis C virus diagnosis and patient sex, do not appear significantly influencing survival of HCC patients after LT, in agreement with some previous data 23,29 . On the contrary, female patients and some liver disease may provide better prognosis to patients with HCC, but this is possibly more because of higher compliance with surveillance than to real biological differences 28,29 .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to our data, concurrent hepatitis C virus diagnosis and patient sex, do not appear significantly influencing survival of HCC patients after LT, in agreement with some previous data 23,29 . On the contrary, female patients and some liver disease may provide better prognosis to patients with HCC, but this is possibly more because of higher compliance with surveillance than to real biological differences 28,29 .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…According to our data, concurrent hepatitis C virus diagnosis and patient sex, do not appear significantly influencing survival of HCC patients after LT, in agreement with some previous data 23,29 . On the contrary, female patients and some liver disease may provide better prognosis to patients with HCC, but this is possibly more because of higher compliance with surveillance than to real biological differences 28,29 . Moreover, some of others donor-, In randomized Brazilian reports, the piggy-back approach was related to higher rate of pulmonary infiltrates 38 , but not to bacterial translocation 39 or stimuli for the production of inflammatory molecules 40 , when compared to the conventional method.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This drawback was particularly evident in men and in patients without seromarkers of viral infection, amongst whom about 50% of HCCs were diagnosed outside surveillance. The relation between patient sex and prevalence of HCC detected by surveillance has been already reported [21] and can be tentatively attributed to a lower compliance to surveillance of men and, particularly, of alcohol abusers (who are more frequently males than females). However, other two factors may have contributed: first, compared to viral cases, the oncological risk in non viral patients is probably underestimated by physicians.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Women tend to have less aggressive liver tumors than men at initial diagnosis23 and also have a better survival than men after treatments45. Possible contributing factors for the gender disparity of HCC include gender-specific lifestyle and social environments, such as alcohol consumption, smoking and HBV or HCV infection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%