Is governance democratic?

Hazenberg, Haye

doi:10.1080/13698230.2013.826499

Cited by 8 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The concept of governance means the decrease of state power, as the collective decision-making process requires stakeholders' involvement at all stages, and collective or public problems are transferred to non-government or private actors to increase the problem-solving ability of the political system. (Hazenberg 2015). It is line with the results of the research which stated that in the relationship mechanism between the parties in TNGR, the key player is TNGR Center as a form of central government in the region.…”

Section: Crowdsupporting

confidence: 83%

“…The interests of each party will influence the relationship mechanism in managing ecotourism hazards in Mount Rinjani National Park (Taman Nasional Gunung Rinjani/TNGR). The decisions made need to be realized through collective action from all stakeholders, including the local community (Hazenberg 2015) that is considered as the reason for an effective tourism destination governance (Çakar 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Identification of Stakeholders and Their Roles in Ecotourism Hazard Management in Mount Rinjani National Park

Muntasib¹,

Rahayuningsih²,

Aminsyah³

2021

Medkon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mount Rinjani is a volcano with hot water, savanna, and other beauty of nature as one of the leading destinations in Lombok. Behind its beauty, Mount Rinjani National Park (TNGR) is in a natural hazard area, making it a disaster-prone area. The objective of this study is to identify the parties and roles of each party involved in the Ecotourism hazard management in TNGR based on their level of interest and influence. Determination of sampling used purposive sampling, as well as semi-structured key informant interviews with snowball sampling using interview guides. The study object of this study were the parties (stakeholders) and the relationship between the parties involved in the hazard management of TNGR ecotourism. The roles of stakeholders in managing the dangers of TNGR Ecotourism were divided into four: support, actors, decision-makers, and infrastructure providers. The key players were TNGR Center and West Nusa Tenggara (NTB) Provincial Tourism Office. The subjects were North Lombok Regency Tourism Office, Central Lombok Regency Tourism Office, East Lombok Culture and Tourism Office, EMHC (Edelweiss Medical Help Center), NTB Provincial Office of Environment and Forestry, Mataram Rescue and Search Office, BPMVG Sembalun, Rinjani Porter Guide Forum, Lombok APGI, Head of Sembalun Subdistrict, Head of Bayan Subdistrict, Sangkreang Nature Lovers Organization, and Tourism Activist Group (Pokdarwis) Rinjani Perkasa. The context setter was Regional Disaster Management Agency (BPBD) of NTB Province. The crowd was NTB Regional Police (Polda), Korem (Subregional Military Command) 162 Wira Bhakti Mataram, Regional Development Planning Agency (Bappeda) of NTB Province, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources of NTB Province, NTB Provincial Public Works and Spatial Planning Office, Rinjani Tourism Image Forum, North Lombok TO Association, Central Lombok TO Association, East Lombok TO Association, Daily Executor Board (DPH) Geopark UGG Rinjani Lombok and Grahaphala Unram. Key words: hazard, management, Mount Rinjani, stakeholder

show abstract

Section: Crowdsupporting

confidence: 83%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Identification of Stakeholders and Their Roles in Ecotourism Hazard Management in Mount Rinjani National Park

Muntasib¹,

Rahayuningsih²,

Aminsyah³

2021

Medkon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The argument of this paper, following the discourse, is focused on the tension between economic and trade-related reform goals and democracy promotion. A similar point in the context of EU internal economic policy has been made by Crum (2013) and regarding governance and democracy by Hazenberg (2013). At the level of theory, however, the argument of this paper is applicable to conditionality generally -the pursuit of substantive ends is ordinarily in tension with the promotion of democracy -a type of governing regime that is open-ended in principle (again, the paper argues that enlargement politics were an exception to this rule).…”

Section: Notesmentioning

confidence: 53%

Promoting democracy through economic conditionality in the ENP: a normative critique

Theuns

2016

Journal of European Integration

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article presents a normative critique of the coherence of democracy promotion in the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP). As an immanent critique, the paper derives its normative standards internally from an analysis of key ENP policy documents. It is argued that democracy promotion is in conflict with some of the other goals of the ENP such as market liberalisation, trade policy reforms and private sector development. Further, the incentive of market integration is argued to undermine democracy promotion. Though the ENP's current way of pursuing the goal of democratisation is normatively incoherent, this article also argues that incentivising democratisation through conditionality is not inherently contradictory. Two potential ways democratisation could be coherently promoted are suggested: delimiting the policy to unilateral transfers conditional on democratisation alone ('simple transfers'), or offering EU membership to ENP countries ('no integration without incorporation').

show abstract

“…Bazı paydaşların yeterli gücü ve yetkisinin olmaması, diğer bir ifadeyle güçlü bürokrasi kararlara katılımını engellemektedir (Jiang ve Ritchie, 2017). Bu bağlamda problem çözme yeteneğini geliştirmek için kamu ve özel sektör temsilcileri ile tüm paydaşların karar alma sürecine eşit bir şekilde katılımının sağlanması devletin karar almadaki gücünü zayıflatmakta, yerel paydaşların turizmin yönetilmesinde ve gelişmesindeki etkinliği artmakta bu durumda etkili destinasyon yönetişiminin sağlanmasını ortaya çıkarmaktadır (Yüksel vd., 2005: 860;Presenza vd., 2013: 29;Hazenberg, 2015 (Levine ve White, 1961;Mohr ve Spekman, 1994: 139;Beritelli, 2011: 624). Fakat güç ile bilgi arasında önemli bir ilişki olduğundan bilgi elinde olan aynı zamanda gücün sahibi olarak görülmektedir (Foucault, 1980).…”

Section: Destinasyon Düzeyinde Paydaşlar Arası İlişkilerunclassified

Turistik Destinasyon Yönetiminde Paydaşlar Arası İlişkiler: Göller Yöresi Örneği

İnanır¹

2019

TR1010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Araştırmanın amacı Göller Yöresinin önemli iki ili olan Burdur ve Isparta illerinde turistik destinasyon yönetiminde oldukça fazla önemi olan turizm paydaşlarının birbirleriyle ilişkilerinin boyutunu etkili yönetişim bağlamında tespit etmektir. Araştırmanın amacına uygun olarak nitel araştırma yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Veriler yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme, katılımcı gözlem ve ilgili yöreye ilişkin yazılı ve görsel dokümanların incelenmesiyle toplanmıştır. Verilerin analizi tümevarımsal içerik analizi yöntemiyle gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma bulguları yörenin oldukça fazla turizm avantajı olmasına rağmen, bu avantajdan yeteri kadar faydalanılamadığını ortaya koymuştur. Aynı zamanda yörede turizminin alt ve üst yapısı, tanıtım ve pazarlaması, imajı, yatırım ve projeleri, paydaşların birbirleriyle ilişkileri konularında yetersizliklerin olduğu ve bunun sonucunda etkili destinasyon yönetişimin yörede sağlanmadığı tespit edilmiştir. Dolayısıyla, yörede etkili destinasyon yönetişimin sağlanması ve yöre turizminin gelişmesi için paydaşlar arası ilişkilerin planlama, liderlik, koordinasyon, iş birliği, iletişim, kararlara katılım, bilgi paylaşımı ve bağlılık konularında artırılması gerekmekte olduğu bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır.

show abstract

Is governance democratic?

Cited by 8 publications

References 18 publications

Identification of Stakeholders and Their Roles in Ecotourism Hazard Management in Mount Rinjani National Park

Identification of Stakeholders and Their Roles in Ecotourism Hazard Management in Mount Rinjani National Park

Promoting democracy through economic conditionality in the ENP: a normative critique

Turistik Destinasyon Yönetiminde Paydaşlar Arası İlişkiler: Göller Yöresi Örneği

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About