2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2109.05641
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Heterophily A Real Nightmare For Graph Neural Networks To Do Node Classification?

Abstract: Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) extend basic Neural Networks (NNs) by using the graph structures based on the relational inductive bias (homophily assumption). Though GNNs are believed to outperform NNs in real-world tasks, performance advantages of GNNs over graph-agnostic NNs seem not generally satisfactory. Heterophily has been considered as a main cause and numerous works have been put forward to address it. In this paper, we first show that not all cases of heterophily are harmful 1 for GNNs with aggregation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Through adaptive frequency signal learning, FAGCN could achieve expressive performance on different types of graphs with homophily and heterophily. Apart from low-pass and high-pass filters, ACM [Luan et al, 2021] further involves the identity filter, which is the linear combination of low-pass and high-pass filters. In this way, ACM could adaptively exploit beneficial neighbor information from different filter channels for each node; Meanwhile, its identity filter could guarantee less information loss of the input signal.…”
Section: Adaptive Message Aggregationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Through adaptive frequency signal learning, FAGCN could achieve expressive performance on different types of graphs with homophily and heterophily. Apart from low-pass and high-pass filters, ACM [Luan et al, 2021] further involves the identity filter, which is the linear combination of low-pass and high-pass filters. In this way, ACM could adaptively exploit beneficial neighbor information from different filter channels for each node; Meanwhile, its identity filter could guarantee less information loss of the input signal.…”
Section: Adaptive Message Aggregationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, WRGNN [Suresh et al, 2021] imposes different mapping functions on the ego-node embedding and its neighbor aggregated messages, while GGCN [Yan et al, 2021] simplifies the mapping functions to learnable scalar parameters to separately learn ego-neighbor representations. Moreover, ACM [Luan et al, 2021] adopts the identity filter to separate the ego embedding and then conducts the channel-level combination with its neighbor information in the update function.…”
Section: Ego-neighbor Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are also works (Zhu et al, 2020b;Bo et al, 2021;Chien et al, 2020;Yan et al, 2021;Suresh et al, 2021;Pei et al, 2020;Dong et al, 2021;Lim et al, 2021;Yang et al, 2021;Luan et al, 2021;Zhu et al, 2020a;Liu et al, 2021) that extend GNNs to heterophilous graphs. Some methods propose to leverage both low-pass and high-pass convolutional filters in neighborhood aggregation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graph neural networks (GNNs) generalize traditional neural network architectures for data in the Euclidean domain to data in non-Euclidean domains [24,38,31]. As graphs are very general and flexible data structures and are ubiquitous in the real world, GNNs are now widely used in a variety of domains and applications such as social network analysis [18], recommender systems [41], graph reasoning [47], and drug discovery [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%