Is Inequality Among Universities Increasing? Gini Coefficients and the Elusive Rise of Elite Universities

Abstract

One of the unintended consequences of the New Public Management (NPM) in universities is often feared to be a division between elite institutions focused on research and large institutions with teaching missions. However, institutional isomorphisms provide counter-incentives. For example, university rankings focus on certain output parameters such as publications, but not on others (e.g., patents). In this study, we apply Gini coefficients to university rankings in order to assess whether universities are becoming more unequal, at the level of both the world and individual nations. Our results do not support the thesis that universities are becoming more unequal. If anything, we predominantly find homogenisation, both at the level of the global comparisons and nationally. In a more restricted dataset (using only publications in the natural and life sciences), we find increasing inequality for those countries, which used NPM during the 1990s, but not during the 2000s. Our findings suggest that increased output steering from the policy side leads to a global conformation to performance standards.

Temporal Analysis on Contribution Inequality in OpenStreetMap: A Comparative Study for Four Countries

“…They are conventionally used in economics to measure national inequality of income. Furthermore, they have been generalised to describe inequalities in other fields, such as education [19] and Wikipedia contributions [20]. In recent literature, they are also used to analyse OSM Wiki editing activities [21].…”

Relational arenas in a regional Higher Education system: Insights from an empirical analysis

“…In fact, larger universities are likely to have a larger scientific production, granting them a more central position. This is particularly the case in the Italian system that shows weak differentiation in research productivity (Halffman, 2010). Moreover, research activity mostly organizes around disciplines, as they have peculiar research agendas, goals, codes, and frames (Whitley, 1984).…”

La desigualdad universitaria, una realidad nacida del mito de la eficiencia

“…Citado en Halffman & Leydesdorff, 2011 Como se aprecia, el eje del cambio consiste en pasar de un sistema de oferta centrado en los insumos a uno de demanda centrado en los productos; en este último caso los indicadores y la rendición de cuentas se vuelven centrales al proceso. Ahora bien, esta lógica se traslada al sector académico, cuya expresión se define por una "reducida regulación estatal y una desconfianza del autogobierno, insistiendo en verdad en la guía externa de las universidades a través de sus clientes, bajo un régimen más administrativo, acentuando la competencia por estudiantes y recursos de investigación -aunque la mezcla exacta de cambios varía entre países" (Halffman et al, 2011) "El discurso oficial sobre el cual se erigen las ideas sobre las transformaciones que requiere la educación superior pública en Colombia, además de no ser sostenible, se torna contradictorio. Si se quiere una universidad que responda a los propósitos buscados, la ley de educación superior debe cambiar, pero no de la manera como se pretende, profundizando las reformas ya impuestas en la Ley 30 de 1992.…”