2020
DOI: 10.1177/1050651920958506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is It Fake News or Is It Open Science? Science Communication in the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract: This article explores science communication in the context of COVID-19 through a case study of a January 31, 2020, bioRxiv preprint publication that led to conspiracy theories by suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 originated in the laboratory through genetic engineering. Analysis will consider the initial preprint, the scientific critique that led it to be withdrawn, the conspiracy theories that continue to circulate, and the larger debate that this example has sparked among advocates and critics of open science.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Various editorials, commentaries, viewpoints, and perspectives also mentioned the fast publication process and preprint service as the major causes of the infodemic ( Mheidly and Fares, 2020 ; Kearsley and Duffy, 2020 ; Anon, 2020 ; Aguilar, 2020 ; Baker et al., 2020 ; Iskander and Bianchi, 2021 ; King, 2020 ; Koerber, 2021 ; Mayo-Yánez, 2020 ; Solomon et al., 2020 ; Toth et al., 2020 ; Ruffell, 2020 ; Henrina et al., 2021 ; Larson, 2020 ; Naeem and Bhatti, 2020 ; Sahoo et al., 2020 ; Khan, 2020 ; Casigliani et al., 2020 ; Barbosa et al., 2020 ). At present, there was no empirical study found to investigate the effect of fast publication on rumor spreading directly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various editorials, commentaries, viewpoints, and perspectives also mentioned the fast publication process and preprint service as the major causes of the infodemic ( Mheidly and Fares, 2020 ; Kearsley and Duffy, 2020 ; Anon, 2020 ; Aguilar, 2020 ; Baker et al., 2020 ; Iskander and Bianchi, 2021 ; King, 2020 ; Koerber, 2021 ; Mayo-Yánez, 2020 ; Solomon et al., 2020 ; Toth et al., 2020 ; Ruffell, 2020 ; Henrina et al., 2021 ; Larson, 2020 ; Naeem and Bhatti, 2020 ; Sahoo et al., 2020 ; Khan, 2020 ; Casigliani et al., 2020 ; Barbosa et al., 2020 ). At present, there was no empirical study found to investigate the effect of fast publication on rumor spreading directly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have been rushed to publication even in well-regarded journals. Unvetted articles on pre-press servers have received enormous attention [ 38 ]. Predatory journals have been allowing anyone with the ability to pay to publish pseudoscience, which has been amplified in mainstream news sources.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following this trend, social networks have innovated the communication of product offerings, digital shopping spaces are increasingly blending into an entertainment experience. In addition, logistical efficiency has encouraged the growth of ecommerce (Koerber, 2021).…”
Section: Intrapersonal Interpersonal Institutionalmentioning
confidence: 99%