2013
DOI: 10.1111/bju.12194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is it still clinically and economically viable in the UK to prescribe vacuum erection devices for patients with erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Total treatment cost for such a period is estimated at £228 (including VAT) according to other studies. 21 This pricing takes into account additional cost of replacements rings. In contrast, cost for ICI over the same period is estimated between £2500–5000.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total treatment cost for such a period is estimated at £228 (including VAT) according to other studies. 21 This pricing takes into account additional cost of replacements rings. In contrast, cost for ICI over the same period is estimated between £2500–5000.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A vacuum erection device (VED) utilises negative pressure to boost arterial/venous inflow into the corpora cavernosum without a band for penile rehabilitation (Lin, Wang, & Wang, ; Qian, Gao, Wei, & Yuan, ). Numerous studies have widely demonstrated the benefits of a VED for erectile function in patients who developed ED due to radical prostatectomy (Lin, Yang, Zhang, Dai, & Wang, ; Vasdev, Hoyland, & Adshead, ; Welliver, Mechlin, Goodwin, Alukal, & McCullough, ). Until recently, only one clinical trial had used VED therapy for the treatment of patients with PD, with its preliminary results showing positive outcomes for reduced Peyronie's‐like plaque size (Raheem et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%