2004
DOI: 10.1051/cocv:2004015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is it wise to keep laminating?

Abstract: Abstract. We study the corrector matrix P ε to the conductivity equations. We show that if P ε converges weakly to the identity, then for any laminate det P ε ≥ 0 at almost every point. This simple property is shown to be false for generic microgeometries if the dimension is greater than two in the work Briane et al. [Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., to appear]. In two dimensions it holds true for any microgeometry as a corollary of the work in Alessandrini and Nesi [Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 158 (2001) 155-171]. W… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Laminates have the advantage over most other composites that their effective properties can be readily calculated, which facilitates a mathematically rigorous treatment. Furthermore, despite their simple building principle, they attain many fundamental bounds, i.e., they often realize the most extreme effective properties any composite can fundamentally have [29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laminates have the advantage over most other composites that their effective properties can be readily calculated, which facilitates a mathematically rigorous treatment. Furthermore, despite their simple building principle, they attain many fundamental bounds, i.e., they often realize the most extreme effective properties any composite can fundamentally have [29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming 〈 E 〉 = I , a perturbation argument [31,32] shows that the sign change of the Hall coefficient is related to the fact that the trace of the cofactor matrix of E ( x ) changes sign, at least in certain regions in the unit cell of periodicity. On the other hand, in any multiple rank laminates (with 〈 E 〉 = I ) Briane and Nesi show that the determinant of E ( x ) remains positive [33], whereas it does take negative values in certain regions in the interlinked tori geometries [34]. While they show that the trace of the cofactor matrix of E ( x ) can change sign in three-phase multiple rank laminates, it is an open question as to whether it can change sign in two-phase multiple rank laminates.…”
Section: Open Problems Involving Quasi-convexificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming E = I, a perturbation argument [14,16] shows that the sign change of the Hall coefficient is related to the fact that the trace of the cofactor matrix of E(x) changes sign, at least in certain regions in the unit cell of periodicity. On the other hand, in any multiple rank laminates (with E = I) Briane and Nesi show that the determinant of E(x) remains positive [18], whereas it does take negative values in certain regions in the interlinked tori geometries [17]. While they show that the trace of the cofactor matrix of E(x) can change sign in three phase multiple rank laminates, it is an open question as to whether it can change sign in two phase multiple rank laminates.…”
Section: Remark 24mentioning
confidence: 99%