2019
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is MHC diversity a better marker for conservation than neutral genetic diversity? A case study of two contrasting dolphin populations

Abstract: Genetic diversity is essential for populations to adapt to changing environments. Measures of genetic diversity are often based on selectively neutral markers, such as microsatellites. Genetic diversity to guide conservation management, however, is better reflected by adaptive markers, including genes of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). Our aim was to assess MHC and neutral genetic diversity in two contrasting bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops aduncus) populations in Western Australia—one apparently viab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
33
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
4
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the current paradigm in conservation genetics would misleadingly suggest that the population with the most neutral diversity has the highest “adaptive potential” regarding future climatic change. Consequently, a recent study on bottlenose dolphin populations ( Tursiops aduncus ) has argued for an evaluation of the levels of diversity contained within the MHC region, rather genome-wide patterns of neutral genetic diversity, for conservation purposes ( 80 ).…”
Section: Neutral Diversity Does Not Predict Adaptive Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the current paradigm in conservation genetics would misleadingly suggest that the population with the most neutral diversity has the highest “adaptive potential” regarding future climatic change. Consequently, a recent study on bottlenose dolphin populations ( Tursiops aduncus ) has argued for an evaluation of the levels of diversity contained within the MHC region, rather genome-wide patterns of neutral genetic diversity, for conservation purposes ( 80 ).…”
Section: Neutral Diversity Does Not Predict Adaptive Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the patterns of divergence in CD1, with amino acid variation enriched within the MHC-like domain, supports the hypothesis that lipid antigen recognition and presentation are the functional drivers of this divergence. These patterns are also observed in MHC genes (which are also undergoing positive selection), with elevated ω at hotspots in the MHC antigen recognition groove ( Hughes and Nei 1990 ; Manlik et al. 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Moreover, the patterns of divergence in CD1, with amino acid variation largely restricted to the MHC-like domain, supports the hypothesis that lipid antigen recognition and presentation are the functional drivers of this divergence. These patterns are also observed in MHC genes (which are also undergoing positive selection), with elevated ω at hotspots in the MHC antigen recognition site (Hughes and Nei 1990;Manlik et al 2019). The electrostatic property variation in lipid ligands is found almost exclusively in the head-groups, with differences in the tail groups restricted to length and geometry of the hydrocarbon tails.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%