1998
DOI: 10.1007/s003000050322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Penguin banding harmless?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
39
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For 1988-1991, a bias may still exist due to the change of instrument size in 1991, but our findings indicate that such a bias is unlikely. Although we do not discount the likelihood that increased drag caused by the instruments or bands had energetic and/or behavioral consequences (Wilson et al 1986;Culik et al 1993Culik et al , 1994Froget et al 1998), we believe such effects could not have produced the patterns exhibited in this study, particularly as the seasonal effects consistently interacted with brood size and were statistically independent of the instrument size and deployment protocols.…”
Section: Methodscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…For 1988-1991, a bias may still exist due to the change of instrument size in 1991, but our findings indicate that such a bias is unlikely. Although we do not discount the likelihood that increased drag caused by the instruments or bands had energetic and/or behavioral consequences (Wilson et al 1986;Culik et al 1993Culik et al , 1994Froget et al 1998), we believe such effects could not have produced the patterns exhibited in this study, particularly as the seasonal effects consistently interacted with brood size and were statistically independent of the instrument size and deployment protocols.…”
Section: Methodscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…The bands were removed at the end of the season or during the implantation (i.e. studied birds were not banded; see Froget et al, 1998).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deleterious effects of flipper bands are well known and include increased energy expenditure, reduced reproductive success, and reduced survival rates (Culik et al 1993;Froget et al 1998;Gauthier-Clerc et al 2004;Dugger et al 2006). Others report little to no effect of properly designed and attached bands (Hindell et al 1996;Boersma and Rebstock 2009).…”
Section: Band Retention and Potential Negative Bias On Survival Estimmentioning
confidence: 99%