2005
DOI: 10.1007/bf02715796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is premating isolation inDrosophila overestimated due to uncontrolled factors?

Abstract: Sexual isolation in Drosophila is typically measured by multiple-choice mating tests. While many environmental variables during such tests are controlled by the researcher, there are some factors that are usually uncontrolled. We demonstrate, using Drosophila melanogaster and D. pseudoobscura flies, that the temperature of rearing, preadult density, and level of consanguinity, can all produce differences in mating propensity between genetically equivalent flies. These differences in mating propensity, in turn,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They noted a problem when multiple-choice experiments continue so long that flies of all genotypes are not available for mating. They recommend that observations be discontinued when either 50% of potential matings have occurred, or after 30 min (see also Casares et al 2005). Many of the matings between the subspecies in our experiment occurred after the first half of matings, but before 30 min, so we chose to base statistical analyzes on data for 30 min of observation.…”
Section: Observations Of Matingsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…They noted a problem when multiple-choice experiments continue so long that flies of all genotypes are not available for mating. They recommend that observations be discontinued when either 50% of potential matings have occurred, or after 30 min (see also Casares et al 2005). Many of the matings between the subspecies in our experiment occurred after the first half of matings, but before 30 min, so we chose to base statistical analyzes on data for 30 min of observation.…”
Section: Observations Of Matingsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Ryan & Rand 1993;Gupta & Sundaran 1994;Wade et al 1995;Coyne et al 2005). The respective advantages and disadvantages of choice versus no-choice mating experiments are still a matter of debate (see Casares et al 2005;Noor & Ortiz-Barrientos 2006). While it has been argued that the design of choice experiments is more realistic than that of no-choice experiments (Spieth & Ringo 1983;Alipaz et al 2005a, b), Coyne et al (2005) suggested that when Drosophila of different strains or species congregate, the flies could evaluate potential mates individually and sequentially reject unfavourable partners.…”
Section: Discussion Male Ability To Use Pheromones To Discriminate Pomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Females mated only once during our observations, and copulations lasted~25 min. Following the established protocol (Casares et al 1998(Casares et al , 2005, we limited statistical analyses to the first 12 matings if more than 12 matings occurred within 1 h because matings would be underestimated if flies become less available after 50% individuals of the population had already mated (Casares et al 1998).…”
Section: Observations Of Matingsmentioning
confidence: 99%