2010
DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000360392.15450.c9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Preoperative Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reliable for Language Areas Mapping in Brain Tumor Surgery? Review of Language Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Direct Cortical Stimulation Correlation Studies

Abstract: The contradictory results of these studies do not allow consideration of language fMRI as an alternative tool to DCS in brain lesions located in language areas, especially in gliomas because of the pattern of growth of these tumors. However, language fMRI conducted with high magnet fields is a promising brain mapping tool that must be validated by DCS in methodological robust studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

10
209
1
7

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 346 publications
(227 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
10
209
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, fMRI is not validated for comprehensive language mapping to tailor surgical margins and avoid post-surgical language decline [Giussani et al, 2010; Szaflarski et al, 2017]. Clinical guidelines for fMRI use are available within radiology [American College of Radiology, 2014] and neuropsychology [Bobholz et al, 2004].…”
Section: 1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, fMRI is not validated for comprehensive language mapping to tailor surgical margins and avoid post-surgical language decline [Giussani et al, 2010; Szaflarski et al, 2017]. Clinical guidelines for fMRI use are available within radiology [American College of Radiology, 2014] and neuropsychology [Bobholz et al, 2004].…”
Section: 1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally agreed that while fMRI identifies cortical regions involved in language, ECS identifies those critical to the function. [9] fMRI language mapping in epilepsy patients relies on blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) contrast. This contrast measures changes in haemodynamic response related to neuronal energy consumption on T2*-weighted MR images while an expressive or receptive language task is being performed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, their results are not comparable, in the vast majority of cases. However, a systematic review of the existent clinical studies show that fMRI constitutes a routine clinical practice in many neuro-oncology centers around the world, which provides the opportunity to the performing neurosurgeon for a more realistic and accurate preoperative discussion with the patient, a wiser decision-making process, a safer surgical planning, and a more aggressive tumor resection [Atlas et al, 1996;Berntsen et al, 2010;Bizzi et al, 2008;Fandino et al, 1999;Fitzgerald et al, 1997;Giussani et al, 2010;Haberg et al, 2004;Hirsch et al, 2000;Hoenig et al, 2005;Krasnow et al, 2003;Krishnan et al, 2004;Lehericy et al, 2000;Li et al, 2010;Lurito et al, 2000;Mueller et al, 1996;National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 2007;Petrovich et al, 2005;Pouratian et al, 2002;Puce et al, 1995;Ruge et al, 1999;Roux et al, 2003;Rutten et al, 2002;Sanai & Berger, 2008;Schulder et al, 1998;Signorelli et al, 2003;Tieleman et al, 2007;Tomczak et al, 2000;Yetkin et al, 1997;Yousry et al, 1995]. Several studies also emphasize that fMRI can localize more accurately motor and sensory cortical areas than language areas, and therefore they indicate the necessity for employing complimentary intraoperative electrophysiological stimulation studies, in cases of tumor proximity to language-associated cortical areas [Berntsen et al, 2010;Giussani et al, 2010;Hirsch et al, 2000;Roux et al, 2003;…”
Section: Neurosurgical Considerations and Clinical Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%